Christian worker files complaint to Trump admin after being fired over pronoun policy

Exclusive: Spencer, Yamr, a man from Wisconsin, asks the Trump administration to intervene after he said he had shot because he refused to use the favorite pronouns that contradict the person’s biological sex – which he claims, and claims that he choose between his lives and faith.

While the Trump administration has moved to the requirements of work at the workplace between the sexes, and it is arguing and passing, a religious Christian, that ordinary citizens are still suffering from discrimination in the workplace linked to these policies.

Now, after submitting a complaint with religious discrimination through the Wisconsin Institute of law and Freedom (Will) to the US Employment Opportunities Committee in the United States (EEOC), he said he hoped President Donald Trump will do something about it.

In an interview with Fox News Digital, Wimmer said he worked hard to be a “typical employee” during the five years in Generas and was in a good position with the company, where he received many positive performance reviews and promotions. He said he expected to have a long and fruitful profession in the power equipment company. This is, until it was suddenly pulled into a meeting with human resources and faced its refusal to use a person’s favorite pronouns.

Distinguishing in the “illegal workplace that DEI” is to be connected by the Acting Trump chair, EEOC

And Yamar says that his refusal to use favorite pronouns is rooted in deep biblical, and religious belief that there are only two types of sexes and that the person cannot turn between one and the other.

He explained that he had previous experience working with people who transmitted sexually, but had a good working relationship with one of his colleagues who were transgender. However, after Wimmer was forced to clarify with human resources that he could not use a good conscience for his transgender colleagues, he was reprimanded for “non -professional” behavior.

According to Will, the company representing Wimmer, GeneraC HR representatives told him that his request to refrain from using sexually transformed pronouns on religious foundations “had no meaning.” Sadr and a written disciplinary note stated, “Refusing to reference to an employee/subordinate by their favorite name/pronouns violate the company’s commercial rules and no policy of harassment.”

After a whole month, he said he felt that he was targeted and intimidated because of his religious beliefs, and the role of the supervisor in GeneraC Power Systems was expelled on April 2. According to Lowl, he was not allowed to collect his personal luggage and was accompanied by the building.

Description and passes the entire episode as “tragic”.

It seems that the Supreme Court stands with parents in the religious freedom dispute over story books

Andrea Lucas has pledged to choose President Donald Trump to work as a prosecutor for the EEOC Equal Committee (EEOC), to make practices inherent in diversity, shares and integration in the workplace priority. (Getty/EEOC)

“I was asked to choose between my failure and my love for God and my beliefs,” he said, adding that it was “Very emotional having everything torn from under me. “

In her complaint to EEOC, she will argue that GeneraC has violated the seventh title of the Civil Rights Law, which prohibits discrimination on employment on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It will confirm that GeneraC violated the rights of Wimmer, although there were no complaints to harassment against him.

Kara Toliver, a lawyer at Will, told Fox News digital that she believes that his case has a wider importance that might affect Americans throughout the country.

She said that the issue is a precedent for the recent Supreme Court in the 2023 case called Groff V. Dejoy for testing, challenging the validity of the inflamed gender affirmation policy of the employer against sincere religious beliefs.

She said, “I think employers have become apparently installed on a lot of identity policy, including the issue of sexual identity,” she said. “But it is very important to keep in mind that even when the seventh address provides some protection for employees against discrimination and harassment in the workplace on the basis of sexual identity, this does not replace or eliminate the protection of the seventh section of religious discrimination and the fact that religious discrimination is illegal.”

The Supreme Court allows the end of the independent agency’s board members

The US Supreme Court is presented at dusk on June 28, 2023, in Washington, DC (Drew Angeler/Getty Images)

He told Wimmer Fox News Digital that “he did not ask Generas the choice between me and then this other person.”

Click here to get the Fox News app

“There was a way at all to work together and we have a compromise as we continue to get a professional environment,” he said. “Unfortunately, there are individuals and there are organizations and structures that do not allow you to settle. The fact that you have these beliefs is unacceptable to them. So, there is no amount of settlement possible.”

In response to the request of Fox News Digital for comment, a spokesman said: “We do not comment on employment issues and do not comment on the suspended litigation.”