Can artists use AI as a tool — if they break it enough?

The arguments against artificial intelligence in art are clear. Most visual artists hate Midjourney, artificial intelligence stability, and similar photo generators, and Windon diverted training data without compensation and general “SLOP” attack. But is it possible to deliberately use artificial intelligence for creative work?

The painter in Auckland, Auckland, is used in California Brett Amori photo generators constantly as tools. Instead of eliminating public images negatively in large sizes-what he himself has indicated as “fast art” for addiction and destroyer-Amory focuses on building the world and the complicity of the machine. He is inspired by his daily function in San Francisco Kenko in the late 1990s, long before he disappeared as a prize -winning painter, when he puts garbage and plants in the audio pictures to make photographic classifications. Now, it pushes LLM to the roles in a language invented, as it incites the visible feedback ring between obstetric images and human intervention.

“We are at a very strange moment for artists at the present time when it is not clear the type of ethical goals that exist around artificial intelligence,” says Ben Davis, the art critic residing in Brooklyn, who is often writes about technology and work. “If you use it, you will be attacked by people. On the other hand – it exists. I don’t think it will return to the box.”

As Davis noticed, artists were manipulating Amnesty International for some time. In 2022, Steve Mag Swanson calls on Amnesty International to create “opposite” Marlon Brando, which generated a nightmare of a woman she called Lab. The so -called “AI Cryptid” has become a Mimi, and its similarity was monitored in the images created by artificial intelligence by some other users who use negative and balanced claims.

As for the 2023 show, Lori Simons merged artificial intelligence tools with digital liberation as well as manual drawing, drawing and sewing into “Dal E” and stable subscriptions to the “ideal cultural memory” frequency of the woman with whom I grew up; I felt that the programs were a new type of collaborator. ”

Such techniques can be returned to the established traditions of “Disinance Art” in which artists make aesthetic. In the late 1960s and 1970s, artists used electronic processing and videos. A prominent characters like Nam June Paik and Jud Yalkut A difficult night In surrealism Electronic Beets. With the emergence of the global web network in the nineties, Joan Heemskerk and Dirk Paesmans inven Wolfinstein 3D Video game in a maze of the first person of abstract forms.

Amory has taken the creation of artificial intelligence defects in the direction of building the world with 800 pages with ChatGPT. He claims to be persuaded LLM to act like excellent cancellation, with Amory as her assistant in the material world. Amory will create a picture and ask ChatgPT to describe it in a language that has been invented by Aiglyphic913.

He can then use the resulting description to demand the generation of more images and editing the results using Photoshop. Or it can print the results that must be worked on by hand, using the tingling gun technology from the Baroque era, then photographing its physical plate to convert an additional AI. He aspires to slow the tendency of artificial intelligence to “Rapid Art” through the technique of the painter, which was won by the prestigious Bullock Krasner Foundation Award in 2023-2024. Inspired by “Moloch”, Allen Gusberg, Chris de Core around the frightening material of the soul, depicting the hybrid paintings of Amory, a repeated character-the mysterious Amnesty International, which is called “non-self” that chases our world, speaks a language we cannot understand.

Davis resembles such techniques to the equivalent of an artist to create an Amnesty International girlfriend. “Basically, these things are black mirrors, and if you tell them,” I want you to pretend that you are evil artificial intelligence, and you talk to her for a long time, so you will finally conclude a character that appeals to you. This can be very strange, because these things have the ability to feed you with things you don’t expect.

However, Davis says that the use of obstetric intelligence has absolutely exacerbated the inclination of digital culture to license the value of any specific image. Since the tools can copy any visible pattern easily and convincingly, the masses condone the materials, which makes them likely to ignore or ignore the images in general, regardless of their occurrence. “These machines are the Day of Resurrection to destroy the capabilities of people creatively,” says Davis.

Artists do not walk quietly. It is clear that the artists objected to the way that technology companies “deal with” in their obstetric models without permission or compensation. After free training of artificial intelligence, technology companies now assume the use of the collective artistic heritage of the world for their benefit, regardless of whether he puts countless artists from work. Some artists have joined more than twenty lawsuits against the IQ companies to steal intellectual property. Others use software tools called Nightshade and GLAZE that deliberately abuse things to “poison” their work against scraping artificial intelligence models. (After Nightshade and Glaze created small “disorders” in the pixels, it is assumed that the artificial intelligence tool cannot accurately require a poisoned image in its model.)

Davis notes that the case of copyright of the photos created by AI itself has not been settled. The courts have not yet been convinced that a person who is used to take a photo created by a machine gun could achieve a result of copyright. But if the human artist converts the image created from artificial intelligence, it may be worth protecting copyright.

Davis notes that in January, a “heinous image” called “one piece of American cheese” became the first image created from artificial intelligence and which is the rights of copyright, according to Invoke Ai, Inc. Because the CEO of the company, who made it able to accurately document his human contributions. However, Noura Shabba, a spokeswoman for the United States Coptic Rights Office, told Nora Shabba. freedom“Since the office issued the instructions for registration of copyright in March 2023, the office has registered more than a thousand works that include artificial intelligence materials, with the registration that covers the human author’s contribution to the work.”

Amuri is sympathetic to copyright fears, as it is, too, his work has been copied and sold under the name of another person. As for his Aiglyphic913 project, he says that the amount in which the images that were created in raw machine guns mean that he has no great concern that he will face the issue of copyright, such as one photographer Patrick Cario fought with the artist Richard Brinns. (The prince took the subject of Cariou’s photos about Rastafarians with “Lozenges”, the guitars, and other things. After five years, the Court of Appeal ruled in 2014 that 25 of the thirty paintings presented by the prince were an example of “fair use”.

Davis suggests that Amory and other artists who use artificial intelligence are “the moment of negotiation”, in an attempt to find out a way to use tools in an interesting and really creative way. But they struggle with the fact that artificial intelligence has reduced the value of the style, once a maximum sign of artistic originality. He says: “Anytime you create a unique style, there is a very complex program that he can look at, strip its characteristics, and re -create it. Therefore, it reduces the value … style.” “I do not think that the artists in the future will be defined by their style. They will be defined by the creative universe they create, by the audience they create.”