Trump asks Supreme Court to allow trans military ban to proceed

The Trump administration requests the Supreme Court to review the minimum court ruling, which temporarily prevented its ban on the sexual transformer forces in the army.

On Thursday’s file, the Ministry of Justice requested that the Supreme Court stop a judicial order for the minimum court and allow the army to cancel the eligibility from the service “individuals who suffer from sex defects or have undergone medical interventions of sexual dysfunction.”

“In the absence of residency, the comprehensive order for the boycott court will remain the period of time throughout the review period in the ninth district, and in this court-a very long time, provided that the army is forced to maintain a policy that he set, in its professional rule, contrary to the military and interactions in the country,” the Trump administration’s attorneys have argued.

In the case he is President Donald Trump on January 27 Executive order Claiming the Ministry of Defense to update its instructions regarding “medical standards through identity for military service” and “canceling the non -compatible guidance with military readiness.”

Higseth says he signs a memorandum on martial weapons criteria for men and women

The American boycott judge, Benjamin Cityel, issued a preliminary judicial order in March, with the exception of the administration from identifying and removing sexual service members during the case.

The administration appealed the Court of Appeal in the ninth district, but a committee of three judges refused to request the remaining order.

The administration argued in the court’s files that the policy “enhances the important interests of the government in military preparation, the cohesion of unity, the good system and discipline, and avoiding the costly costs.”

However, the ninth department refused to grant administrative residency, which would allow the government to impose a ban during the preparation of the legal challenge.

“The Ministry of Justice has strongly defended President Trump’s executive measures, including defining the priorities of military excellence and the executive system of preparation, and he will continue to do so,” an official at the Ministry of Justice told Fox News Digital at that time.

Politics faced multiple legal challenges, including a high -level lawsuit filed in Washington, DC

The Federal Court warns the Pentagon against working against the members of the transgender service during the appeal

Under extinguishing the fire is the executive order of President Donald Trump on January 27, and the Ministry of Defense is required to update its guidelines regarding “medical standards through identity for military service” and “cancellation of guidance that does not correspond to military readiness.” (Brandon Bell/Getti Emaiz)

On March 27, a committee of three judges in the Court of Appeal in the Capital Department stopped the minimum order to block the ban. The committee confirmed that residence “should not be interpreted in any way as a ruling on the advantages of the case.

The committee also said that it reserves the right to raise the residence if it turns out that the army had taken a negative action against members of the transgender service.

On March 26, American boycott judge, Anna Reyes, denied the administration to resolve the Zarbian order earlier from the ban on the Pentagon’s ban. The decision came two days before the prohibition was appointed on March 28.

Trump’s military embargo dealt with the legal strike after the Court of Appeal

Politics has become a target of multiple legal challenges, with one noticeable lawsuit from Washington, DC (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Reyes asked the government to pay the deadline for the execution of the original March, saying it wanted to allow more time to appeal.

Click for the Fox News app

She also said that she had previously allowed a lot of time to resume her previous opinion.

“I don’t want to tighten the constant current. This is my main concern here,” Reyes said during the March 21 session. “My room worked incredibly hard to get out of an opinion on time.”

Breanne Deppisch from Fox News Digital contributed to this report.