Ending birthright citizenship would have drastic negative impact, its defenders warn

The Supreme Court heard the case this month focused on the president Donald Trump The executive thing that seeks to end the so -called citizenship, in one of the most monitored cases and possibly influencing the court in recent years.
Although the case itself was largely used as a way to defy the powers of the minimum court to issue the so -called global judicial orders or at the country level, the judges in the Supreme Court inquired about the advantages of the same order, “protecting the meaning and value of American citizenship”, which Trump signed on the first day of the second White House.
The matter, which was scheduled to take power on February 20, was all American agencies to stop issuing citizenship documents for children born to illegal immigrants or children born in the country with a temporary visa, if the father is not a permanent resident or an American citizen.
Although the Supreme Court focus on comprehensive orders to hear the case, deep and disgusting concerns continue to try Trump to retract more than 100 years of legal precedents.
Fifth Judges Trump: Below are the main court battles, stop the White House’s agenda
US President Donald Trump is walking his hands with the President of the United States Supreme Court John Roberts (PBUH) in the role of Melania Trump, Donald Trump Junior and Ivanka Trump after they swore during the opening celebrations in Rotonda in Capitol in the United States on January 20, 2025, in Washington, DC. (Reuters)
The American Civil Liberties Union was included in a lawsuit for the story of a couple from Indonesia, but they live in New Hampshire who said they will be affected by the system.
“They arrived in 2023, applied for asylum, and they are waiting for their application,” ACLU’s lawyers said of the couple. “My mom is in the third trimester of pregnancy.
They added, “Under this executive order, their child is considered uncomfortable, and health care and basic nutrition can be rejected, which exposes the new baby a great danger in such a weak stage of life,” they added.
Lawyers indicated to the group that these problems will continue throughout their lives. These people will not be able to obtain the necessary identity, such as drivers licenses, and they will not be able to vote, occupy some jobs or work in jury bodies.
Although Trump has occurred in detail in his first term and the campaign’s path about the desire to end the newborn citizenship, his executive has sent shock waves across the nation. It was met with a wave of lawsuits from the states led by Democrats and immigrant rights groups.
Who is James Boasberg, the American judge at the Trump Deport efforts?

The demonstrators carry signs during “hands outside!” Protest against President Donald Trump in Washington’s monument in Washington, on Saturday, April 5, 2025. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
One of the lawsuits, which was filed by 18 democratic lawyers, warned against ending the newly born citizenship on the United States of their nationality as a result of a circumstance completely outside the control of the child.
Statistics carry this as well. Nearly 150,000 children are born annually in the United States for non -dating parents. If it will get strength as Trump depicts, experts warn that the effect will be catastrophic.
“” President Trump’s attempt to end citizenship unilaterally is a flagrant violation of our constitution, “said the New Jersey Public Prosecutor Matthew Platin, who joined 17 other countries led by the Democrats, earlier this year.
Trump faces another deportation setback with the Court of Appeal in the fourth district

The United States Supreme Court is located in the new discussion center on the interpretation of a prerequisite for the fourteenth amendment. (Drew Angeler/Getty Images)
“For more than 150 years, our country has followed the same basic rule: children born in this country are American citizens,” Platin added.
Click here to get the Fox News app
More than 22 American states and immigrant rights groups filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration to prevent change in the newly born citizenship before the Supreme Court’s decision, on the pretext that the executive order is unconstitutional and “unprecedented”.
So far, no court has stopped alongside the Trump administration in supporting the executive order.
Don’t miss more hot News like this! Click here to discover the latest in Politics news!
2025-05-25 11:00:00