Wikipedia pauses AI summaries after editors skewer the idea

Wikipedia has retracted the abstracts of the artificial intelligence article … at the present time. Earlier this month, the platform tried the feature in its mobile phone application. Saying that they were not future by the editors would be underestimated. The Wikimedia (WMF) has stopped testing a day later.

Artificial intelligence summaries appeared at the top of the articles by 10 percent of mobile phone users. Readers had to choose to see them. The abstracts created from artificial intelligence only appeared “on a group of articles” for the experimental period for two weeks.

The editor’s comments in the WMF advertisement (across 404 mediaYuk ranged into “a smile with horror.” One of the editors wrote, “Just because Google has put up the abstract intelligence summaries does not mean that we need to follow them. I sincerely beg to not test this, on the mobile phone or anywhere else. This will lead to immediately irreversible harm to our readers and issuing our reputation as a source of trustworthy and dangerous.”

“In some respects, Wikipedia has become a burning word for boring, which is excellent,” the editor continued. “Let’s not congratulate our readers’ intelligence and join Stampeed to launch cheerful abstracts. “

AI-summaries-after-editors-skewer-the-idea.jpeg" height="576" width="960" class="caas-img has-width"/>

The grip of the editors was not limited to the idea. They also criticized non -profit organizations to exclude them from the planning stage. “You also say that this was” discussed “, which is just laughing like the” discussion “with which one participant is totally associated with, the original poster, another WMF employee.

In a statement to 404 mediaA WMF spokesman said that the reverse reaction affected his decision. “It is common to get a variety of comments from volunteers, and merge them in our decisions, and sometimes we change the path.” “We welcome such studied comments – this still makes Wikipedia a truly cooperative platform for human knowledge.”

On the “Discussion” page, the organization made it clear that it wanted to meet the needs of its fans. “Many readers need some simplified texts in addition to the main content,” wrote a WMF employee. “In previous research, we heard that readers wanted to have an option to get a quick overview of the topic before jumping to read the full article.”

The WMF employee stated that the average reading level for the original English speakers is 14 or 15 years old. “It may be less for the non -indigenous English speakers who are reading Wikipedia regularly,” they added.

The organization has not excluded the future uses of Amnesty International. But they said that the editors will not be left in the next time. “Bringing artificial intelligence in the Wikipedia reading experience is a dangerous set of decisions, with important effects, and we intend to deal with it in this way,” the spokesman said. 404 media. “We do not have any plans to bring a brief feature to the wiki without the editor’s participation.”