Judge asks if troops in Los Angeles are violating the Posse Comitatus Act

The American boycott judge, Charles Prayer, postponed the issuance of any additional rulings and instead requested surroundings from both sides by Monday about whether the Posse Comitaus law, which prohibits the forces of the enforcement of the civil law on American soil, violates Los Angeles.

The hearing occurred the next day, the Appeal Committee of the Ninth Circuit to control the National Guard forces, which was deployed in response to the protests against the immigration raids.

“Violation of the Posse Comitaus law is imminent, if not already being ongoing,” Breyer, if Breyer, was postponed last week, given this claim.

Vice President JD Vance, a veterans of marine warriors, traveled to Los Angeles on Friday and met the forces, including the US Marine Corps who were deployed to protect federal buildings.

According to Fans, the court decided to design Trump to send the federal forces “legitimacy” and would do so again if necessary.

“The president has a very simple suggestion for everyone in every city, and every society, every city, whether large or small, if you impose your own laws, and if you protect the application of the federal law, we will not send the National Guard because it is unnecessary,” Vans told reporters after I toured a federal complex in Los Angeles.

The Vans Tour came at the Center for Multi -Agency Federal Operations and the Mobile Command Center, where the demonstrations calmed down after sometimes clashing about violence between the demonstrators and the police, the outbreak of sabotage and the collapse that followed the immigration raids throughout southern California earlier this month. Tens of thousands have gone peacefully in Los Angeles since June 8.

The National Guard forces are accompanying federal agents in some immigration raids, and the naval infantry was briefly held a man on the first day who were deployed to protect a federal building. It carries the first federal forces mark for the civil time since its publication in the country’s second largest city.

Trump allowed to continue controlling the National Guard

Prayer found that Trump illegally acted when the president, due to the opposition of the California governor, activated the soldiers. However, the appeal decision stopped the judge’s temporary restriction order. Prayer asked the lawyers on Friday to address whether he or the Court of Appeal retains the preliminary jurisdiction to grant a judicial order under the Posse Comitaus law.

California has sought a preliminary judicial order that gives Newsom control of the forces in Los Angeles, where the protests have calmed down in recent days.

Trump, Republican, argued that the forces were necessary to restore the regime. Newsom, a democratic, said that their presence in the streets of an American city inflamed in tensions, raped the local authority and wasted resources.

The mayor of Los Angeles raises the curfew after the protests subsided

The demonstrations seem to end, although dozens of demonstrators appeared on Thursday at the Dodger Stadium, where a group of federal agents gathered in a car park with covered faces, and they traveled in SUVs and charging trucks. Los Angeles Dodgers asked to leave, and they did.

On Tuesday, the Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass lifted a curfew in the city center, which was first imposed in response to sabotage and clashes with the police after the crowds gathered in the opposition of the agents who take migrants to detention.

Trump’s federal members of the National Guard in California under authority known as title 10.

Chapter 10 allows the president to contact the National Guard to federal service when the country is invaded, when it is “a rebellion or a risk of rebellion against the authority of the government”, or when the president is unable to “implement the laws of the United States.”

Prayer found that Trump has exceeded his legal authority, which he said allowed the presidents to control the National Guard forces only during times of “rebellion or the risk of rebellion”.

“The protests in Los Angeles are largely lacked” the rebellion. ”

The National Guard remains in the hands of federalism with the revenues of the case

The Trump administration argued that the courts could not guess the president’s decisions. Otherwise, the Appeals Committee ruled that the presidents do not have an unrestricted power to control the state guard, but the committee said that by referring to violent actions by the demonstrators in this case, the Trump administration provided sufficient evidence to show that it had a periodic basis for the depiction of the forces.

Currently, the National Guard in California will remain in the hands of the federal with the continuation of the lawsuit. This is the first deployment of the state of the National Guard of the state without the permission of the ruler since the forces were sent to protect the civil rights movement marches in 1965.

Trump celebrated the appeal in a post on social media, describing it as a “big victory” and a hint of more potential publishing operations.

Newsom, for his part, warned that California will not be the last state to see the streets if Trump made his way.