When ‘Think Different’ Becomes ‘Think Like Everyone Else’

Nearly three decades ago, the philosophy of Apple “Think VARCH” has identified not only its marketing but also its entire institutional identity. The company that revolutionized the personal computing, turned the music industry, and re -visualizing mobile phones had always been proud to build everything at home – from silicon to software, from processors to user interfaces. However, the revelation of this week that Apple is considering using artificial intelligence technology from human or Openai to run a new version of Siri, highlighting its own internal models, perhaps the most deep philosophical transformation in the modern history of the company.

This is not just a technical axis; It is an existential recognition that the legendary vertical integration strategy, which is the basis of its excellent brand and the lock of the ecosystems, has faced its match in the era of artificial intelligence.

Apple’s vertical integration has always been its secret weapon. While the competitors together bring together components of various suppliers, Apple dominates each aspect of user experience. This strategy has led to the integration of the unlike iPhone software, the M-Series chips that revolutionized, and the AirPods that redefined the wireless sound.

But artificial intelligence represents a fundamental challenge. Unlike the manufacture of devices or software development, Apple can systematically build experience over the years, artificial intelligence requires huge mathematical resources and specialized talent, and the most important time that Apple does not have. Apple was late for Google, and Anthropor in the artificial intelligence race, and the company officially delayed Siri, the updated in March 2025, after it promised the enhanced capabilities since last year.

Also read:

This possible partnership with man or Openai is more than the use of external sources – it is a basic recognition that the Apple innovation model has limits. Consider effects:

• Brand identity crisis: The outstanding pricing of Apple has always been justified by its unique and ownership technology. If the same artificial intelligence models are running the same that runs competitors, what exactly does customers pay Apple?

• Domain surrenderApple has historically maintained a narrow grip on user data and experiences. The partnership with abroad intelligence providers means sharing this control – and the possible user data – with companies whose priorities may not be in line with Apple messages for the first privacy.

• Ability innovationFor the first time in decades, the leading Apple feature improvements will depend on road maps and capabilities on external companies, and not the timeline of their research and development.

Perhaps the most disturbing thing is what this says about the ability to innovate Apple. The company, which ridiculed the mockery of competitors, admits that there is mainly that it cannot compete with startups that were established only a few years ago. The switching to Claude or Openai for Siri will be a recognition that the company is struggling to compete in artificial intelligence – the most important new technology in decades.

This is not necessarily a death of Apple’s innovation culture, but it is definitely a modest moment. The company, which has now defined multiple industries, finds to play annex to the most transformative technological transformation since the Internet itself.

Partnership with Openai will provide Apple a precious time to continue to improve their artificial intelligence models while continuing to provide modern artificial intelligence features that customers expect. This can be considered strategic pragmatism instead of surrender; A temporary compromise allows Apple to compete while building long -term capabilities.

However, the central question remains: Did the different “Apple” philosophy evolve into something more traditional? The company, which is betting in its future, is now thinking about revolutionary internal innovations now in licensing the same technologies that define the next era of computing.

This scenario is likely to be remembered as a turning point when the principle of the vertical integration of Apple has the biggest challenge. Whether this represents adaptive development or the beginning of a more fundamental transformation of residues that must be seen. What is certain is that the company that taught the world “thinking different” is now thinking like anyone else – and that this shift involves profound effects on both Apple and the broader technological landscape.

Also read: