Blake Lively Fears ‘Mental Health Issues’ Are At Risk Of Being Leaked

The couple submitted a request to preserve their texts with the “prominent” persons, noting that a Balaouni camp may leak them to the press.

However, Justin’s lawyer Balouni Friedman has returned to Blake Levli and Ryan Reynolds, describing their “unnecessary” suggestion.

Lively and Reynolds want to keep their conversations, especially with the ongoing court battle with Baldoni wages.

In a hearing in the Manhattan Federal Court on Thursday, lawyer Merrill Connant Al -Hakim said that the couple wanted a preventive matter before they revealed the conversations with the prominent “people” about the time of “Laver” on “ending with us”, where they fear that they will leak them without the press, for every person for each. Traded stone.

The lawyer in the court explained that such texts will have a “value of public relations”, whether they are related to the truth of the case or not.

Al -Hakimaki said: “There is a great opportunity for an irreplaceable damage if the marginal conversations with prominent individuals who are not related to the case will fall into the wrong hands.”

“There are 100 million reasons for these parties to leak information because the value of public relations is greater than compliance with the orders of the court,” the lawyer added.

According to the news port, Lavelli’s lawyer went further to urge Judge Louis Lieman to put an additional layer of security, known as the “Lawyer Eyes only” category, for such texts, as well as information about the mental health of the parties, and the security measures they took amid the dispute.

The rulers emphasized that such an appointment is placed on information that included “talking about children, deep mental health issues, private housing sites, or homes.”

When I asked Lyman the referendum on whether she meant that a lawyer in the blogging had a “danger” of vital security and Rynold, the lawyer said, “No.”

However, the governments noted that the accused participating in the inferiority include people “who depend on their entire lives to provide information to the creators of the press and content.”

Baldian Periden’s lawyer has since re -requested a couple of power, saying it was “unnecessary” and “an attack that anyone suggests that we ignore a preventive matter.”

Friedman added that the Lifely and Reynolds plan will not fairly treat “famous people” and “strong people in the industry” differently from others.

He also explained that the so -called “form” is a preventive matter that was submitted to the court to prevent the leakage of sensitive information in the case already sufficient protection.

He said to the court for everyone New York PostAdding that its proposed preparation is not intended to “abuse” vitality.

Judge Lehman did not immediately pass his rule, saying that he would give his view “soon.” However, he has warned that since the case acquired the public interest, “there is an assumption for public arrival” in federal courts.

Lehman added that the current conditions for the proposed protection order will already prevent third parties from leaking sensitive information to the press, adding that any such toughest can be held in the court contempt, and thus risk a fine or even prison.

This comes after Lehman suggested on Tuesday to refuse New York Times As a plaintiff in an inferior lawsuit against vitality.

The “Jin The Virgin” star denied the allegations of sexual harassment that the actress “Gossip Girl” criticized and filed a $ 250 million defamation against her and news specifications, which published her allegations.

After that, he continued with a $ 400 million in Bastrak against vitality, Reynolds, and their propaganda Leslie Sloan, accusing them of plotting to destroy his reputation and control the movie from him.

However, Judge Lehman said New York Times February 28, the proposal was exempted from the case, “Great Reasons for Chapter” and “Show strongly that his proposal to separation is likely to succeed in one foundation.”

The last court session comes after the summons of Levli, who asked for more than two years from the director’s call and text data by Judge Lehman.

Levli’s request “documents related to communications and issued calls or text messages … during the time period from December 1, 2022 to the present time.”

However, Lyman has ruled in the past, saying that the request of Levli may lead to the issuance of sensitive information associated with doctors, psychologists and communications with people who are not associated with their cause.

The judge also asked the reason for requesting calls and text data for two years before the alleged campaign of my country began for 2024 against it.

Judge Lehman said, for each Daily Mail.

He continued: “But according to Levli’s complaint, this negative campaign did not start until August 2024 … so it is not clear how communications to and from parties in 2022 and 2023 will reveal the individuals who participated in the campaign.”