Trump Rolling Back AI Regulations Hinders Innovation

Donald Trump “really gets it.” This is according to no less than the authority of Sam Altman, CEO of Openai, who was commenting on the understanding of the American President of Amnesty International and ways to maximize its capabilities.

Certainly, the fact that Trump prevented time in his first full day in his position to photograph Altman along with other art stars in the Roosevelt room in the White House to announce the AI’s half -trillion dollar infrastructure project tells us that Trump gets the national importance of AI.

Donald Trump “really gets it.” This is according to no less than the authority of Sam Altman, CEO of Openai, who was commenting on the understanding of the American President of Amnesty International and ways to maximize its capabilities.

Certainly, the fact that Trump prevented time in his first full day in his position to photograph Altman along with other art stars in the Roosevelt room in the White House to announce the AI’s half -trillion dollar infrastructure project tells us that Trump gets the national importance of AI.

What about the executive order of the president who facilitates the needs of artificial intelligence by expanding the ability of American nuclear energy, followed by “AI and the Summit of Energy”? Doesn’t these measures show that Trump gets tools that the United States government must withdraw to operate the rapid infrastructure of artificial intelligence?

Or what about the executive order of the former President Joe Biden, calls on handrails on artificial intelligence in order to make room for new executive orders accelerate the acceleration of American artificial intelligence? What does this show if Trump does not understand the urgency of progress in creating artificial intelligence?

It is not about skiing on the offer side-The Trump administration gets the needs of the demand side as well. At the local level, there is a focus on “high -influence” use cases, with recent government directives about obtaining artificial intelligence and using it for federal government purposes. On his opening external journey in his second term, Trump traveled with the gifts of Amnesty International, which led to a series of deals that give the United Arab Emirates and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to obtain high -performance AI chips. It seems that he already imagines a new global system, or jumping previous monuments such as NATO or G-7 or development aid programs, as exclusive access to American artificial intelligence buyers is the reason for the new influence on the world around the world.

At the local level, even Trump signed one beautiful beautiful invoice, which has nothing to do with AI, giving way to the condition of accelerating artificial intelligence. The ruling prevented the American states from trying to organize artificial intelligence for a decade. The Senate voted 99-1 to kill the ruling. At least, Trump can say: Hey, I tried.

He put the honor that they once stabbed to become a Nobel Prize winner. Did Trump already feed his legacy as “the head of artificial intelligence”? Is it to Amnesty International what was JFK to place a man on the surface of the moon?

When answering this question, we must analyze the wisdom of Trump’s central contribution, through Amnesty International policy: Getting rid of a superficial attention to the government that regulates or creates any handrails on developing and using artificial intelligence. To appreciate the accurate relationship between organization and innovation, he considered strange development after the Senate 99-1 voted to allow the states to develop its organizational frameworks. Many large technology giants – Amazon, Google and Microsoft – are now pressing federal regulations; Some are open to a mixture of federal and loyal regulations, while others prefer that federal regulations exclude any state that may appear. This informal observer may be hit as a bit strange because the supposed artificial intelligence chief provides a green light, however companies ask for a ward. It is clear that large technology knows a lot about technology. Is there anything about artificial intelligence that gives a lie to Trump “really gets it”?

Of course, technology companies prefer not to have to deal with the multiple regulations that depend on the country that will add to the costs of compliance and time, but there is more this seam of federal regulations of artificial intelligence producers. Contrary to the belief that the organization only works on revolutionary progress of new technologies, history has shown that general intervention is necessary for private innovation. In fact, this is the moment in the path of developing artificial intelligence where it is indispensable to the government handrails, and here are some reasons behind this.

Dancing: The regulations serve many goals, but one of its central benefits will be a common template for artificial intelligence developers to demonstrate that they had many concerns that led to the high user’s lack of confidence in artificial intelligence. According to Yougov survey, the majority of Americans, regardless of political affiliation, are concerned about technology, especially about wrong information, privacy, moral issues and bias – and as a result, they prefer a degree of organization. The insecurity of dependence, which in turn reduces the return on the strategic investments made by the developers of artificial intelligence. In fact, the lack of confidence in the employee impedes the implementation of artificial intelligence through the American workforce; Even Keith Sondrling, Deputy Minister of Labor at Trump, confessed to a recent round of business table.

Clarity of lending and standards: Besides the application of confidence -building features, regulations can define common requirements for data quality, model documents, and risk assessment. Such requirements – while virtual and bureaucracy – destroys a degree of clarity that benefit all participants in the emerging industry quickly. Unified disclosure reduces compliance costs; The well -known playing rules give competitors incentives to develop a strategy while investing in the minimum requirements to develop safe and responsible artificial intelligence; Greens that avoid the most dangerous risks can create a safer environment for experimenting, which is very necessary for innovation. The criteria also increase the susceptibility of inter -operating, which in previous waves of digital technologies have greatly expanded the chances of innovation and new applications.

In general, in the absence of clear guidelines, governance management, accountability frameworks and known rules of play, companies have few criteria on the amount that must be adhered to in terms of resources allocated to various aspects of developing artificial intelligence. Consequently, they are at risk of not investing in both investment. Without following a unified approach, it is difficult to report the returns on investments or risks by referring to the common accepted standards, which in turn leads to an inefficiency in allocating capital.

Competitive innovation stimulation: The well -designed organization can ensure fair and legal access to critical resources, such as data, account and infrastructure. The rules in force in a unified manner help competitors of all sizes to participate without the need to rely on the extensive legal and administrative expenditures. The standard of the country or a useful basic framework and the preference of multiple regulations developed in various cases. The latter, in turn, is the best of the lack of regulations at all and should be coordinated anywhere. This creates opportunities for smaller players to enter and compete alongside senior job occupants. The creation of intellectual property rights for data and anti -pregnancy regulations not only creates the field of play more and innovation, but also enhances a technology that needs various perspectives and display applications from a group of service providers.

Create global competitiveness: Besides the American border, American artificial intelligence models without handrails can end in a competitive position if they developed a reputation for being adequately unintended to the features of confidence building. Moreover, organizers in the judicial states such as the European Union – as well as international companies, users and investors – require additional assurances that the risks of artificial intelligence have been addressed before they are paid for the products and their use. The presence of the regulations in effect in a proactive manner helps American companies compatible with the minimum standards and not having to guess over a violent reaction on the road or a new set of harsh regulations that were later created due to the crisis.

The choice, at the end, Not between organization and innovation, but between smart regulations that facilitate useful innovation, competition, productive adoption and organizational failure that undermines all of these. Away from being an enemy of innovation, the organization is an essential partner.

History provides many examples of the loss of this connection and consequences, from drugs, games, electronics, children’s food, or cosmetics. There are examples from all these categories of these products that have been released without a suitable organization that leads to everything from public health crises to summon the products. Consider the 2008 financial collapse, resulting from unorganized financial products that lead to Domino from regular disasters. The Trump team will benefit from Amnesty International from studying new tobacco products, such as nicotine connectivity systems and nicotine cows. It was put up with the minimum regulatory controls and caused a violent reaction in the main markets such as Indonesia. Then there is a failure to coordinate regulations across the major judicial states such as the United States and Europe, which contributes to the loss of public confidence in genetically modified organisms.

Trump is clearly getting “quickly move and breaking things” from technology, as he seems to be applied to all other aspects of his governance. But this mantra did not advance well; This was a mistake for previous waves of technical innovation, which is definitely wrong for Amnesty International.