Appeals court backs Trump on withholding $16 billion climate grants

The Federal Court of Appeal said on Tuesday that the Federal Provincial Court has incorrectly prevented the administration of President Donald Trump from temporarily blocking billions of dollars in climate grants.

The provincial court of Washington, DC, gave a judicial order preventing the Trump administration from blocking $ 16 billion as climate grants. On Tuesday, a ruling from the Capital Court finds that the minimum court exceeded its authority to do so, and that the Trump Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was acting according to its role to provide “appropriate supervision” on how to distribute money.

Judge Neumi Rao wrote in the court’s opinion: “We conclude that the provincial court has offended its discretionary authority to issue the Zarbish order. It is unlikely that those granted in advantages will succeed because their claims are mainly contractual, and thus the judicial jurisdiction lies exclusively in the Federal Claims Court.”

“Although the provincial court had a jurisdiction of the constitutional prosecution of the recipient, this claim is not permissible.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs to start the universal workers’ demobilization of about 1,800 employees in the coming days

The case is related to the granting of the Environmental Protection Agency of $ 16 billion granted under the previous administration to five non -profit organizations to enhance the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. The non -profit organizations included the Climate United Fund, Coalition for Green Capital and Power Forward Communities, Inc. , Inclusiv, Inc. , Justice Climate Fund, Inc.

When Trump took office, the new Environmental Protection Agency conducted a review of the program and sought to reduce the flow of funds. Then the non -profit organizations filed, and the provincial court granted them a judicial order.

Judge Rao wrote that the records show that one month before Trump took office, the Environmental Protection Agency has amended the grant agreements “to make it difficult for the government to end the grants.”

Federal judge throws a lawsuit against Trump against the Sanctuary Policies in Chicago

The opinion also indicates statements from an employee of the Environmental Protection Agency that he said after Trump’s electoral victory, the Environmental Protection Agency under the leadership of President Joe Biden was “just trying to get money as quickly as possible.”

“The employee compared the situation” to throw golden bars on Titanic, “Rao wrote.

After this point, the Trump Environmental Protection Agency reviewed the grant program and sought to kill him.

“It is great to see the reason prevailing in the court system,” an Environmental Protection Agency spokesman told Fox News Digital on Tuesday. “The Environmental Protection Agency has a duty to be an exceptional host of taxpayers dollars. The official has canceled these grants due to the well -documented concerns about self -dealing, struggling conflicts, unqualified recipients, and intentionally reduced the agency.

The fires of the US Department of Agriculture formed foreign workers two opponents, including China, in the movement of national security protection

The United Ruling Fund has responded shortly after its delivery, with CEO Bethbuffal condemnation of the result. The other four organizations did not immediately respond to the suspension requests.

While we are disappointed by the committee’s decision, we stand firm on the advantages of our issue: the freezing of the Environmental Protection Agency illegally and the money that was legal and the legal money has been completed. Binding and spending. This is another obstacle in our battle to reduce energy costs for those who need it more while creating job opportunities for diligent Americans, but we will continue to continue in societies throughout the country that benefit from clean and loyal energy at reasonable prices. Pufford wrote that this is not the end of our way.

The director of the Environmental Protection Agency Lee Zeldin led the agency in significant discounts in the era of President Trump’s administration. (AP Photo/Jacquilyn Martin, File)

The other four non -profit organizations immediately did not respond to the suspension requests.

The discounts were only a small part of the Trump voltage wider to curb government spending through the executive branch. In July, the Environmental Protection Agency announced plans to reduce its 23 % power and the closure of the Research and Development Office.

Click here to get the Fox News app

“Under the leadership of President Trump, the Environmental Protection Agency gave a closer look at our operations to ensure that the agency is more equipped than ever to provide our basic mission to protect human health and the environment with the operation of the great American return,” the official of the Environmental Protection Agency Li Zildin He said in the July statement.

Read the full opinion of the capital’s circle below (App users click here)