Tried Originality AI Grammar Checker for 1 Month: My Experience

Amegentality.ai’s Grammar Checker is a free -powered intelligence tool that aims to capture spelling errors, rules, and numbering marks before publishing.

Main promises:

• Repairing typographical errors, punctuation errors, drawing, subject agreement, use of incorrect words, abuse of contractions, separating lines, single errors against plural, and more.
• The option of “repair problem” with one click: after it highlights the problems, you can quickly fix them.
• You can get a “performance card” that shows the number of rules/spelling problems facing your text.
• Up to about 2000 words per exam for free. For longer texts / more use, you will need to register / use Fuller.
• Now it works in The United States of English For rules/spelling.

Diving Asala Auditor, grammatical rules

Features and what makes them useful

Below I think it is the strengths – which makes this tool worth trying (especially if you write a lot):

Restrictions and what should be paid attention to

There is no perfect tool, and there are bodies. I want to make sure to see it, so don’t be disappointed.

• Only the English United States for rules/satire. If you write the British English, or mix several accents, there may be an incompatible mismatch or suggestion.
• To get more grammatical grammar/stereotypes (tone, sound, flow, rhetorical style) may not pick up everything. It focuses on right than art.
• If you use “problem repair” a lot, you may sometimes make “correct” technically “” correct changes but change your voice or the intended meaning a little. You will need to review.
• For long documents (exceeding 2000 words per exam), you will need to register or use paid features. It can add the cost if you write heavy.
• Sometimes, you know common rules tools, but acceptable or colloquial use, especially if you are writing in an informal style. There is a risk of excessive correction and natural loss.

expertise Asala Auditor, grammatical rules

You took emotional and practical: Why are you attractive (and when it might be frustrated)

Writing anything (emails, blogs, proposals) has insecurity – “Are the rules delegated?” “Does this error embarrass me?” “Is my writing dirty?” This tool gives you a safety net. Good feeling: less anxious, more confidence in what you publish.

On the other hand: There is something that is completely satisfactory about writing (in informal or creative settings) and a personality.

If you always allow the bases tools your health, you may feel that your authentic voice is very smooth. Sometimes I miss my writing in my writing after “automatically applied everything”.

Who is this best tool for

If you are, I will try this tool, especially if you are:

• Write often (blog publications, website content, and proposals) and you want to polish them quickly
• You do not have a large editor or editor who supports you
• You want to reduce errors before showing your writing to customers or audiences
• Simple, fast and exact tools are preferred to mostly instead of downloading them

If you are creating creatively, in dialect, or loves stylistic experience, you will continue to use this – but perhaps less aggressive. Use it as an assistant, not a dictator.

My judgment: Should you try it?

Yes, I think you should. Free tool, low risk. I think it adds a value (especially for small but embarrassing errors that slide when rushing).

If you are, I will test it on something I already wrote (perhaps a draft publishing of the blog or an email is about to send it). He sees:

• How many corrections do you suggest?
• Whether they feel that they are useful or excessively warning
• Whether the “fixed” version keeps your voice

If you like what you see, merge it into your workflow: rough draft → Wiping the rules → Final editing.