Starmer Is the Dog Who Caught the Car

Did Britain become like Italy? Or Belgium? The comparison may be unfair to these two countries. Since Britain has left the European Union, the UK has become a leader in Europe in terms of governments full of panic and short -term.

Kiir Starmer’s election was supposed to change in July 2024. A senior official promised a prime minister in the United Kingdom, with a huge parliamentary majority, by returning to stability and growth. Now, London has been absorbed by talking about the overthrow of Starmer, which is likely to occur after the local and regional elections in the coming May, where the Labor Party can get

There is a little disagreement unilaterally in the ranks of Starmer and bypassing it that his term has been amazing disappointment so far. The only two questions are the reason that it has reached this and whether he could do anything to divert the situation.

At the beginning of September, again from the summer vacation (though, for the second year in a row, he spent a little time). It looked good, but he did not specify what the update might require. I was told that this term was suggested by one of the veteran Tony Blair assistants in a social event, and I was surprised by his vision the next day.

Over the next two weeks, caravans have been attached to a mixture of bad luck, the individual limits, bad judgment, and lack of a more sustainable narration that could help compensate for the negative narration.

The deputy prime minister in Starmer, Angela Rainer, a woman with a true working class who entered politics through gravel and charisma. After the ongoing investigation by the right -wing newspapers, which aims to drop someone who is likely to be popular, it was found that Rainer had obtained lever taxes over the course of a property that she bought. Support her curtain, until it was sacked.

Then came the fall of Shakespeare from “Prince of Darkness”, Peter Mandleson, about seven months after the British ambassador to the United States. (Mandelson loves the addresses and palace designed by Edwin Luthyns on Massachusetts Street, at the Embassy in Washington). Starmer wanted to appoint a signing of the sophisticated sophisticated mission of managing relations with US President Donald Trump. He was persuaded to move to Mandson-who is a bi-bow, three times, the Minister of Ministers twice, and the European Commissioner for one time, he did not know him well.

Everyone in politics knows, or knows, Mandson. I dealt with him since he was the chief strategy in Blair and the rotational doctor in the mid -nineties and witnessed directly the strategic nucleus, his solid design, his poetic clarification almost for those who consider a problem or is not related (or not rich enough), and his arrogance. Looking at the company he kept, it was surprising if he was not an intimate friend of the Epstein.

Starmer supported Mandson and then removed him later, making it the third time that he was removed from a higher job due to a scandal. The difference in this last issue was that the Prime Minister asked a senior official in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to do so on his behalf. Now, Starmer must face Trump’s visit to the state to the United Kingdom without an envoy.

Mandson insisted that he told his interview committee how much his links with Epstein, but the Downing Street circle denied this and said it was economical with the truth. Once Trump’s trip ends, will the former smart envoy get a form of revenge? It may not need to do so – mothers are lining up within the Labor Party to create Starmer.

It is worth remembering the status of the Earth 14 months ago. In July 2024, the General Labor Party gave an amazing majority 174 seats. This was the third best show in the party’s history and its best since Blair at the end of the century.

To be fair, the background was not like in 1997. Blair – after 18 years of conservative rule – was celebrating the streets. The tremors are sent below the backbone to reconsider those moments. The most equivalent is the election of Barack Obama as an American president in 2008.

Starmer’s victory came against a darker international and local background. The number of seats won by the Labor Party, thanks to the strange electoral system in Britain, did not reflect its actual share of the vote, which, by 33 percent, had only raised marginally from the previous elections, when it lost.

However, winning was the victory, and the new Prime Minister was full control over parliament. Similar leaders throughout Europe, who were forced to clarify with some fragile coalitions, looked at envy.

There was one big problem. A lawyer through training and prosecutor for most of his career, Starmer came to politics very late. His strengths are clear – it’s good in arguments, and it is organized. Its early successes were impressive – as there was a political party still in the grip, uniting its leadership, and expelling the conservatives after 14 years of chaos.

The problem was that, as soon as he arrived, Starmer does not seem to know what he wants to do with his new strength. His behavior of foreign policy was his remarkable achievement, which includes his strong support for Ukraine and a coalition of desire, as well as a structure with Trump.

In the homeland, the weaknesses in Starmer have become more clear. After he rose to power with a few political close associates, he tended to the homeland for individuals who impressed his recent statements; In addition, some of the old Blair team retreated. They were good for their time, but many consultants have already been forced out of the Starmer circle.

One of them still exists – his main assistant Morgan Maksini, who is now blamed for everything that happened wrongly, including Mandason’s date.

Since labor is dominated by the fear of Nigel Farraj, the Islah Party, and even more right-wing forces-like those supported by Elon Musk, who recently told London to more than 100,000 people in a video address to use violence-the government sings to manipulate them by despair.

It was Maksini who urged Starner to pay social welfare discounts, into the opposition teeth of the Parliament’s Labor Party members, and merged a more striking line on immigration. It was McSWeney who was also forced to amend the ministers in the Merry-Ghur tour earlier this month, as the foreign and internal ministers and justice were replaced just as they had to control their summaries.

Away from promising in a new start, Starmer’s footnote was active with the same activity in briefing against each other, taking free where they could, and show the exceptional lack of emotional intelligence, such as the Minister of Estonlation that raises tenants to increase rent in her own property.

With his tendency to look at his shoulder, instead of driving from the front, the new Samira Starmer is the mayor of Manchester, the city of “Northern Powerhouse” in England. Andy Bourneham, who was a minister during the era of Blair but was not Blaira, as a man in waiting. Bornham will depict itself as a “soft left” candidate, with a more focus on luxury and workers’ rights, as well as a potential wealth tax. However, his supporters indicate that, as a former minister and his successor, Gordon Brown, he is part of the prevailing tradition of the Labor Party.

Success for him, however, will not be clear. First, Bournem must restore a seat in Parliament, and Farage has promised that the reform will throw every possible resource to humiliate it. Then, he should win the work of the work. The more dangerous Bornham becomes reform and conservatives, the more the British major media in general.

Looking at the tendency of the crisis in the UK on a weekly or monthly basis, anything can happen, and forecasts are usually wrong. It is not unreasonable for Starmer to circumvent and produce the echo, including a more cohesive and comprehensive group of economic and social policies. The clock, however, beats.

By May, Britain could have the sixth prime minister in a decade. And if you are wondering, Italy is in the fifth and Belgium in its fourth.