Tesla’s Robotaxi Plans Are So Jumbled That Officials Are Begging It To Clarify What the Heck It’s Actually Doing

When Elon Musk boasted in July that he “gets the organizational permission” to provide Tesla’s Robotaxi to the San Francisco Bay area, this news appears to be for the organizers.

like Reuters Reports, both the National Road Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the California government Transport Agency have amazed Tesla’s ambitious plans to bring self -driving taxis to another state. Practical officials of the auto industry begged to clarify their next steps and clarify the large “confusion” – to no avail.

This lack of the clear trend shows the chaos of EV’s stab. The limits of its technology.

After nearly a decade of musk, the musk promised that self-driving taxis were just around the corner-he claimed that before the launch-the experimental program that started in Austin, Texas, adopts in June on “Human Safety MonitoringSHe sits in the front passengers seats in its cars.

Although this entire defeat is defeated by a roboty, Tesla is still the charge of her customers for horse riding, which led to it from the limits of a cautious test on the reckless publication of an incomplete product.

It became clear immediately the reason for the presence of drivers there. Cars, which also depend on remotely, showed strange and dangerous behavior, including some incidents that seem to break traffic laws. More extension of the definition of “robotics”, sometimes, will sit human safety screens for service in the driver’s seat, including highways.

In short, it is barely running in the small area of ​​one city – which most likely explains some of the territe when the news broke out that it will come to the Gulf region as well.

“Did you meet your team Tesla and discuss this week?” Karim Habib, an investigator in NHTSA, wrote in an email to California officials in July Reuters Metni.

The answer of the state employee: Of course not.

It turned out that Tesla did not apply for self -driving permits for the appropriate Robotaxi service, and instead, it was planned on pre -arranged trips in the vehicles that a person driven and are available only by invitation.

He was also using a dedicated permit for limousine cars, which did not allow riding. However, there was musk, saying that the robots would be published “perhaps within a month or two.”

Soon after, Emily Warren, Deputy Minister of Transport in the state, has raised concerns about the general misconceptions surrounding the Tesla Bay area in an e -mail to the general policy employee in Tesla, who was also obtained Reuters. The employee, Nawani Dexon, answered that the California Public Utilities Committee had informed that it had been planning to ride the non -independent car that is limited to the family and friends in Tesla.

This was not explained by the reason for reports that Tesla was bringing “Robotaxi” service to the area, so Warren pressed.

“Do you have plans to clarify the nature of the Gulf region’s expanding operations in Tesla to dispel confusion?” He asked Warren.

I got not answers.

“As a general policy, Tesla does not respond to press inquiries,” Dexon said. Customers will receive information about horseback services “when they are available”.

A CPUC spokesman said Reuters Tesla is required to describe “properly and accurately” to serve it and ensure that its connections “provide a clear discrimination” between its human -dependent operations in California and its presentation to the independent horse riding it offers elsewhere.

But since these exchanges, Tesla has taken the unclear of what “Robotaxi” is further. In a tweet earlier this month, reports noted that the official Tesla account is proud that its full situation for itself, a system of assistance to drivers that requires a person to supervise him constantly, was the same practical.

“99 dollars/month to get a roboty subject to your supervision,” you read Tesla’s tweet.

There is likely to be a very simple reason, behind the scenes and in legal settings, Tasla avoids saying that it publishes independent driving technique. According to Matio Wanzli, a professor and expert of an independent vehicle at Cardoso College in New York, he can take advantage of the massive “robotics” noise without exposing himself to the organizational audit it deserves.

“They do not want to tell the organizers that they have an automatic driving system.” Reuters“Because they are subject to other regulations in many cases.”

More about Tesla: Robotaxis Tesla has already entered into many accidents