AI coding assistant Cursor reportedly tells a ‘vibe coder’ to write his own damn code

Since companies are racing to replace humans with “agents” of artificial intelligence, the coding index may have given us a peek on the situations that robots can bring to work as well.

According to what was reported by the user, the user named “Janswist”, that the code must be written instead of relying on the indicator to do this for it.

“I cannot create a symbol for you, because that may complete your business … You must develop logic yourself. This guarantees you to understand the system and can maintain it properly,” said Janswist, the index after spent an hour in coding “Vepi” with the tool.

So Janswist reported errors report on the company’s product forum: “Cursor told me that I should learn coding instead of requesting it,” and including a screenshot. The error report soon went on Hacker news, and it was covered by ARS Technica.

Janswist speculated that it hit a kind of maximum at 750-800 lines of software instructions, although other users answered that the indicator will write a code more than them. One of the commentators suggested that Yanswist should have used the integration of the index’s “agent”, which works for larger coding projects. Anysphere, an indicator maker, cannot be accessed.

But Cursor’s refusal also seemed shocking like the responses that novice programmers can get when asking Forming Stack Overflow, as people have indicated Hacker News.

The suggestion is that if the indicator is trained on this site, he may have learned not only the tips of coding, but also the human snark as well.