A Chinese Peace Summit in Beijing Could Help Trump and Putin End the War in Ukraine

US president Donald Trump and the next Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska are an optimistic start to end the war in Ukraine. But real peace will require more than just the participation of the United States and Russia. It also requires Ukraine, Europe, the United Nations and China.

Moscow and Kiev are still far from how to end the war. Although he suffers from amazing losses with some dramatic changes on the ground, none of the two sides showed any general willingness to give up its main demands. Ukraine is unwilling to accept the conditions that require disarmament or stopping land without securing some meaningful protection in return. Russia, of course, is still pushing for these concessions, while refusing the possibility of security commitment to Ukraine from NATO.

US President Donald Trump and the next Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska are an optimistic start to end the war in Ukraine. But real peace will require more than just the participation of the United States and Russia. It also requires Ukraine, Europe, the United Nations and China.

Moscow and Kiev are still far from how to end the war. Although he suffers from amazing losses with some dramatic changes on the ground, none of the two sides showed any general willingness to give up its main demands. Ukraine is unwilling to accept the conditions that require disarmament or stopping land without securing some meaningful protection in return. Russia, of course, is still pushing for these concessions, while refusing the possibility of security commitment to Ukraine from NATO.

But behind public situations, there is a different fact. Ukrainian President Folodimir Zelinski pointed to the openness to a decision with Russia under the appropriate circumstances. The transfer of the Putin regime, in turn, is ready to consider the United Nations -led peace framework, as shown in the statements of the United Nations Ambassador of the Russian Vasily Nippinsia. In this context, it is difficult to negotiate a solution that respects the red lines of both sides, but not impossible.

China is unique to help break the network. Beijing can mean a follow -up summit that brings together Ukraine, Russia, the United States and Europe, which leads to a face -to -face meeting between the leaders of all these players. The goal is to create an official framework for party talks consisting of the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, as well as Ukraine and European Union representatives.

China has both the diplomatic diplomat and economic leverage to withdraw this. There is still a trade partner in Russia and Ukraine larger, at a value of 240.1 billion dollars and 12.8 billion dollars, respectively, in 2023. Each of Russia and Ukraine are members of the Belt and Road Initiative, and China is particularly investing in the stability of grain exports in Ukraine. As a result, Beijing can provide Russia on the slope you need and provides assistance in reconstruction and recovery to Ukraine.

The framework of seven parties avoids a single aspect of the surrender of the other’s account. Instead, it works to reformulate the problem by searching for common interests-such as nuclear safety, regional stability, and ending the human misery created by active fighting-which can be attached to more controversial discussions.

The first step is the ceasefire. History shows that even partial success here can stop escalating, re -make flexibility, and helps create a frame in which more permanent arrangements can be formed in the end. Places and early work do not need to solve each regional or legal claim in the foreground. Instead, they should seek to freeze hostilities, open human passages, restore basic economic functions, and start negotiations on a long -term settlement.

Once the limited ceasefire is secured, the space will be open to the United Nations peacekeeping force to expand it. US Defense Secretary Beit Higseth said at the Brussels NATO meetings at the Munich Security Conference that the deployment of American forces to Ukraine would be unacceptable and that “any security guarantee should be supported by European and non -European forces.”

HegSeth’s comments provide a promising way to move forward. The effective power of peacekeeping can consist of a mixture of non -attributed and European self. This would provide a vibrant medium land, which reduces concerns on both sides of the conflict. Their physical presence would prevent the conflict in the future and ensure the beginning of the reconstruction process. Such power can consist of five European countries – such as Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Poland and Italy – and five countries such as China, Brazil, India, South Africa and Egypt. This arrangement would emphasize neutrality and also distribute responsibility, thus ensuring the legitimacy of the broad base and guaranteeing solid safety.

The relative distance of BRICS from European security affairs can be converted into an advantage. Since it is less historical, it is more able to provide creative guarantees and measures to build confidence that all parties can accept. This support should not only include peace conservation but also long -term development assistance.

Post -war recovery plans will be vital. The task of rebuilding Ukraine requires sustainable international efforts – not only financial, but also logistical and technical. The BRICS countries, especially China, have engineering experience and financing capacity to help reconstruction. China’s participation will not only help Ukraine’s recovery, but also show Beijing’s broader commitment to peace, stability and comprehensive development. Within this framework, smaller working groups can face specific challenges: human access, regional conflicts, energy infrastructure, and long-term security guarantee-which are strengthened by a more diverse alliance than shareholders.

The summit of peace that includes all stakeholders – may have been announced at the United Nations – can prove that competition does not need to prevent cooperation. With the threat of new conflicts from the Middle East to East Asia, the whole world bears the responsibility for helping to preserve peace. By hosting seven -party conversations, Beijing can drive the road.