A US judge partially blocked Trump’s ‘election integrity’ executive order last month. Here’s why.

Last month, a federal judge in Washington, DC, prevented the main parts of President Donald Trump’s executive order regarding the integrity of the elections – a step confirming the deep division of the country about the meaning of “election safety” really ..

Although Trump’s executive order was titled “Preserving the Elections and Protecting the American Election”, the National Democratic Party (DNC), who led a group of prosecutors in challenging the matter in the Federal Court, argued that it was an attempt to recover the elections and deprive voters.

In the end, both sides won – somewhat, at least at the present time. Here is what to know about the issue concerned:

Trump asks Scotus to strip the protected position of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan immigrants

Why did the judge prevent part of the matter?

The American boycott judge, Colin Collar-Kotelle, eventually left in the place of three main parts of Trump’s executive order, including the ruling that requires states not to calculate the polling cards that were received after the election day, in a partial victory for the Trump administration.

But she stood with the Democratic Presses in the ban, at the present time, both new evidence for the citizen for federal voter registration models and a ruling that directs election officials to verify the nationality of potential voters.

Voters are working on polling cards at a polls at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library on Election Day, Tuesday, November 5, 2024, in the Simi Valley, California. (AP Photo/Chris Pizzello)

Does she have the authority to do this?

Unambiguously, yes. This is exactly the problem that modern presidents face when trying to make permanent changes through executive orders – a tactic preferred by both Democrats and Republicans.

It is a risky method for judgment for two reasons. The first is that these requests can be easily transferred by the upcoming Supreme Commander (as it was presented under the last four departments).

They also risk stopping in federal courts, where American judges are explicitly assigned to work as an investigation of the president, and they are free to stop or stop these orders of force, if they are identified outside the scope of the executive branches.

This also does not mean that the provincial courts need to have the final statement on this topic.

Trump’s executive command on the vote was banned by federal judges amid a wave of legal setbacks

The United States Court of America was seen in Barrett Bettian early on the morning of December 10, 2024, in Washington, DC (David Ake/Getty Images)

Kollar-Kotelly stressed last month that voter registration laws and the ability to organize elections are determined by congress and individual countries, not the executive branch.

Each of the states and Congress can pass laws as long as they “unnecessarily impose” an unjustified burden on voters under the fourteenth amendment of the United States constitution.

But the executive branch, which does not participate in these capabilities to establish and issue laws related to elections, is not entitled to obtain the same level of legal review, according to the judge.

“Our constitution entrusted Congress and the states-not the president-the authority to organize federal elections,” Kola Koteli said in its ruling.

Fifth Judges Trump: Below are the main court battles, stop the White House’s agenda

The following steps

The Trump administration, of course, is free to appeal the decision of the Supreme Courts, if it chooses to do so.

“President Trump will continue to fight for the integrity of the elections, despite the democratic objections that reveal their contempt for participation guarantees such as verification of citizenship,” said White House spokesman Harrison Fields.

Click here to get the Fox News app

But its next steps are still unclear. So far, the administration has not resumed the matter, and officials have not said categorically whether they were planning to do so.