AOC opposes House resolution honoring Charlie Kirk after assassination

On Friday, Representative Alexandria Okasio Cortez opposed a decision to honor the life and founder of the founder of Turning Point Usa Charlie Kerk, who was assassinated on September 10 during a link to speak at the University of Utah Valley.

In a letter in the house hall, OCASIO-Cortez claimed that the decision was submitted on the basis of a “purely party, instead of uniting Congress.”

After condemning the Kirk killing, she indicated that the decision “brings great pain to millions of Americans who endured the chapter, Jim Crowe and the legacy of intolerance today” and tore a 31 -year -old ideology.

“We must be clear about who Charlie Kirk, a man believed that the Civil Rights law that gave black Americans that the right to vote was a mistake, which, after the violent attack on Paul Pelosi, claimed that” some amazing patriots “should save the brutal striker and accused the Jews of controlling” not only the colleges, it’s others from others, “it is it.” Okasio Cortez said.

58 Democrats House voted against the decision to honor “life and legacy” by Charlie Kerk

“His speech and beliefs were ignorant and uneducated and sought to deprive millions of Americans – far from” working tirelessly to enhance unity, “as the majority confirmed in this decision.”

The decision described Kirk as a “loyal Christian”, a “custom husband” and “a love father” for two children, explaining his founding of the Turning Point Usa program and praises his embodiment in the first amendment.

The House of Representatives has been condemned by Kirk’s assassination and all forms of political violence; He praised the law enforcement to capture the alleged Kirk killer; The extended condolences to the Kirk family; Kerk’s life, leadership and legacy; All Americans – regardless of race, party affiliation or belief – called for “rejecting political violence, contacting respected discussion, supporting American values, and respecting each other as American colleagues.”

AOC claimed that Charlie Kerk “” discourse and beliefs were ignorant and uneducated and sought to deprive millions of Americans. “ (Fox News)

The “Fear” tour takes the task of freedom of expression in Charlie Kerk to colleges worldwide

In addition to OCASIO-Cortez, 57 other Democrats voted against decision, including Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, and Rashida Tleb from Michigan and Maxine California Water.

However, 95 democratic decision to adopt decision, including the leader of the minority Hakim Jeffrez, DN.Y. , Catherine Clark, D-Mass.

Here are the details of Kerk’s general comments regarding the topics mentioned by OCASIO-Cortez in its opposition.

AOC’s claim: Charlie Kirk was a man who believed the Civil Rights Law that gave black Americans that the right to vote was a “mistake”

During February 2, 2024, the podcast episode with the “Fearless” host, Jason Whitke, Kerke admitted his ideas about the Civil Law and its role in American society “provocative”, thank White Look for the opportunity to explain this.

“It is a terrible provocative conversation that started. I stand on her side, and I appreciate this opportunity. I mean this sincerely, Jason – to explain it. Even some people on the right were just insults, and they will not be in the offer to explain this.”

Kirk went on to say that he discussed a large scale in the Civil Rights Law, what he tried to accomplish, and how it was sold to the American people at that time and how it is now seen by the modern academic consensus.

Charlie Kerk, the founder of Turning Point Usa, speaks during the Turning Point Action Action 15 July 2023, in West Palm Beach, Florida. (AP Photo/Lynne Sladky, File)

“At that time, of course, there were legislative priorities that the federal government must stop to stop the bitter semester – I have always seen it,” Kirk said. “The American people believed that they were obtaining simple legislative amendments to say that the race -based separation is evil and wrong. In fact, what they obtained was the birth of a permanent state of bureaucrats who were looking for racism as it did not exist, in the end with positive work, shares and employment practices that expanded to race in gay issues.

“What is really generated by civil rights is that this is the task of the federal government and not only to say that discrimination is wrong, but on any kind of different results and trying to even the result under the guise of stocks.”

Trump’s fighting sounds refer to Charlie Kerk’s legacy after the assassination, he says he was doing the policy “The right path”

Kirk continued to discuss Martin Luther King Junior’s speech, “I had a dream,” saying he “bought 100 %” the need for equality, adding that he believed that the Civil Rights Law has been expanded more than the initial intention.

“At that time, most Americans wanted to see the end of the chapter,” he said. “They did not want to see the new chapter in anti -eggs employment practices, positive or federal bureaucratic work with racist employment classes.

“Ultimately, you look around you and you have only black defenders in hundreds of universities throughout the country, only black graduation parties … … You are looking at the Civil Rights Law and you say may have passed and made something that we do not intend, and it is federal federal in the form of hostility to racism.”

Watch: Click here to watch the full podcast episode

AOC’s claim: After Paul Pelosi’s violent attack, Charlie Kirk claimed that “some amazing national” should save the brutal striker

On October 31, 2022, an episode of “The Charlie Kirk Show”, entitled “A naked tin from Maga”, Kirk, October 28, 2022, discussed the attack on Nancy Pelosi’s husband, saying directly, “I do not qualify it, I think it is terrible.”

David Deepyeb, a Canadian citizen living in the United States, was sentenced to life imprisonment in 2024 after he attacked Paul Pelosi with a hammer, causing head wounds and injuries to his right arm and hand.

Depape, who Kirk described in the episode as a “not sane” person, admitted a plot to hold the Speaker of the then Democratic parliament, Nancy Pelosi, as a hostage and “break her knee” if she did not recognize the claim of “lying” about the investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential campaign. She was not at home at the time of the attack.

Kirk condemned the violent attack on Paul Pelosi, who was attacked by a man with a hammer in San Francisco on October 28, 2022. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

KIRK’s comments on “Depape” regarding the concept of contrast were within the non -cash sponsorship policies.

Under the non -cash sponsorship policies, the suspect who was arrested due to a crime before the trial is released without the need to pay the guarantee or bonds. The fees were placed in place to ensure that the suspects do not escape and motivate them for the back of the scheduled court.

While many liberal judicial states have enacted these policies, critics claim that non -cash guarantee endangered the public and enables the perpetrators to be repeated.

“I am not eligible [the attack]”I think it is terrible. This is not true. But why, in Chicago, you can commit a murder and come out the next day? Why can you infringe on infringement, second degree killing, intentional burning, a threat of a public official, [and receive] With non -cash guarantee? This happens all over San Francisco, but if you go after the dolly … you [not] He called immediately. I understood it. “

Charlie Kerk drew it “controversial”, “provocative” in covering the assassination of the media

Kirk continued to ask about the reason for the Depape prison in San Francisco, a democratic stronghold with a non -cash sponsorship policies in force at the time of Paul Pelosi’s attack.

Just a few months before the attack, the San Francisco Brooke Jenkins County Lawyer announced that her office had developed a policy that would seek a cash guarantee in some misdemeanor cases, claiming the guarantee, “to punish those who suffer from less financial means and impatiently affect the accused of colors.”

“Why is the conservative movement to blame homosexuals, naked with schizophrenia who are cannabis jewelry makers, storming a person’s house?” Kirk said during a DEPEPE ideology discussion. “Why do we blame that exactly, and why are he still in prison. Why is it not saved? By the way, if there are some amazing patriots there in San Francisco or the Gulf region wants to be a hero in the middle of the period, and someone must go out and explode this man. I bet that the guarantee is like 30[,000] Or 40,000 dollars. Save it, then go, ask him some questions. ”

Watch: Click here to watch the full episode

Kirk continued to wish Paul Pelosi a rapid recovery and condemned the attack for the second time.

“So, look, I wish him the best. I wish him a quick recovery,” Kirk said. “No one should face this type of violence.”

Charlie Kerk was a conservative activist who led Turning Point Usa. (Alex Brandon/Associated Press)

AOC’s claim: Charlie Kerk accused the Jews of controlling colleges only – they are non -profit organizations, they are films, they are Hollywood, all of this. “

On October 26, 2024, a episode of “The Charlie Kirk Show”, Kirk claimed that Jewish donors were the mechanism of financing No. 1 of extremist compromise policies, cultural and unbearable institutions.

“This is a monster created by secular Jews,” Kirk said. “Now the Jews will come, and they are like,” What happened on Earth? “It is not only colleges.

Kirk, a long -standing supporter of Israel, argued later on November 16, 2023, an episode of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” Eileon Musk helped in the digital narration “that some Jewish organizations and donors, including the Anti -Defamation Association (ADL), helped fund” anti -white “or” cultural Marxist “ideas that are in line with the movement of blacks or diversity and the inclusion of stocks (Dei).

Click here to get the Fox News app

He pointed out that he does not believe that all the Jewish people are hostile to the white, which determines that it is “not like generalizations.”

“I don’t like the generalizations,” Kirk said in the episode. “Not every Jewish person thinks that. But it is correct that the Anti -Distort Association was an integral part of black life. It is managed for colleges.”

Kirk added that after the October episode, critics described him as anti -Semitism, explaining that he was “happy because the Jewish Americans reconsider their financing of cultural Marxism, and the people intentionally misunderstood and parted that they are hostile to the two of the two.”

While “Cultural Marxism” was used as a anti -Semitic phrase, it was known that commentators used it without anti -Semitic intention.