Attorney General Bondi claims Flores decree incentivizes illegal immigration

In a proposal presented to the Federal Court of Los Angeles, Trump is moving the Ministry of Justice to dissolve the “Flores approval decree”. Public Prosecutor Bam Bondi maintains that the decree stimulates illegal immigration on the southern border.

Flores decree has been sentenced to detention and release migrant children since 1997.

The federal judge appointed by Biden continues to prevent the supervisor of Trump from financing lawyers for immigrants

However, the proposal to finish the Flores decree will be heard in a July 18 hearing before the American boycott judge Dolly G in Los Angeles. Judge Ji has presided over the case for years, and it is unlikely to agree to get rid of the Flores decree, establish a possible battle before the Federal Appeal Court, and eventually the Supreme Court.

“The old Flores approval decree has been implemented as the Stopgap procedure nearly 30 years ago, but in recent years, illegal immigration has been directly stimulated on our southern borders. congress and various federal agencies have already resolved the problems that Flores are designed to fix, and this approval has now become unacceptable restrictions on Agenda America-Fair Agenda.”

Federal judge, Bacaz Trump, is responsible, delay the rejection of the MS-13 leader’s case

Justice officials also tell Fox News that the idea is to restore power to the hands of elected officials in Washington, instead of one federal judge in California.

In the deposit of the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Justice says that the government is moving, “to completely finish FSA and with regard to all the defendants, and to dissolve a judicial order for the court in the regulations of the Ministry of National Security for the sake of arrest, treatment, care, and custody of foreign minors … after 40 years of the international border, it after it has finished this border.

Justice officials also tell Fox News that the idea is to restore power to the hands of elected officials in Washington, instead of one federal judge in California. (Ting Shen/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

More deposit:

In light of the important changes in circumstances since this court entered FSA 28 years ago, including issuing regulations that include FSA goals, and the precedent of the Supreme Court that is inconsistent with the continuation of this long -term decree, the continuation of more FSA is no longer fair or in the public interest.

Trump, the Ministry of Justice, the legal appeal falls during the Biden era of the Border Security law

This court entered FSA as a approval decree in 1997 and amended it in December 2001. FSA has ruled the care and custody of unaccompanied foreign children (UACS) since then, despite the enlarged legislation by Congress and the US Agency. In 2015, this FSA court expanded the accompanying children, see Flores V. Lynch, 828 F.3D 898, 906, 909 (9th Cir. 2016), although it is clear from the FSA terms that the parties did not think about including. Thus, with regard to united children, the national policy has long laid down a local court (not the president or Congress), although the approval decree that provides the basis of the court’s supervision does not claim to organize this group of foreigners. This simply cannot be.

Judge Ji has presided over the case for years, and it is unlikely to agree to get rid of the Flores decree, establish a possible battle before the Federal Appeal Court, and eventually the Supreme Court. (Drew Angeler/Getty Images)

During the 28 years, this court controlled federal policy in terms of custody of foreign children in the United States without a migration, and huge changes and cardinal: Foreigners storms in the United States have entered between the entry ports across the southwestern border, including large groups of foreigners who voluntarily received the border patrol – practiced by the birth of the street verafts; The demographic composition of foreigners who reached the border has turned into a much higher numbers of countries outside the western hemisphere and higher numbers than children; The global epidemic necessitated the government’s use of the expulsion power to protect public health; The subsequent policy has led to a revolution in immigration policy for more than two years.

The CEO was unable to fully respond to these changes because FSA has a federal immigration policy.

Click here to get the Fox News app

The successive departments have tried to no avail to liberate themselves from the approval decree restrictions and this court will receive this. But the detention of foreigners is still – as it was more than one generation – is advancing in the 1997 agreement.