Lawyer Who Defeated Tesla in Court Posts “Damn It Feels Good to Be a Gangsta” by Geto Boys

Tesla Elusk CEO spent more than a decade making misleading promises about the so -called “self -driving” programming.

The company’s automatic pilot has been linked and the features of “full self -driving” drivers have a wrong with hundreds of collision and dozens of deaths since then. But instead of being responsible for her misleading claims in court, Tesla has chosen to a large level of victims, and she often fights teeth and nails to prevent important breakdowns data.

All of this has changed earlier this month, when a federal jury in Florida found a partially Tesla for a fatal collision of 2019, which includes the automated pilot, and requires Tesla to pay up to $ 243 million-nearly a quarter of a billion dollars-in the punitive and compensatory damage of the 22-year-old fathers who died well, in addition to her remaining friend.

For legal experts, it can put a dangerous precedent for the EV maker.

“This will open the flood gates,” said Miguel Costio, a car lawyer who crashes a car that does not participate in the case, said, Associated Press After the ruling. “Many people will be encouraged to come to court.”

The lawyer behind the referee that changes the game, Bretr Shreper, is understandable. like freedom Reports, posted a video on Instagram a day later, with a suitable song: “A curse of good to be a gang”, the 1992 hip -hop anthem by the boys.

It may seem like an unnecessary way to deal with himself – but the ruling stands out in a long series of legal skirmishes that Tesla has gone through thanks to the defective driver aid program.

In an interview with freedomNote, Note how to use the words of musk against him.

“My topic was in my closing argument about Tesla options and Tesla’s words,” he said.

“There is a tinkering in the showroom, then there is a tasel in the courtroom,” Shrebar said. “Tesla tells you in the showroom that they invented the greatest full -driving car that the world has ever.

“These statements were incorrect on the day he said to them because they remain incorrect today,” he said.

Schrebyr also claimed that Tesla was well aware of the shortcomings of her program and that drivers were constantly using them.

EV Maker is one of the outer parts in a growing list of car makers who develop the technology of Advanced Driver Assistance Software (Adas).

“This was not a car company that entered technology,” Shrebar said. “This was a technical company that entered the cars,” adding that Tesla knowing “issued a pilot product” to the public.

Worse, Musk decided to cancel Lidar and Radar sensors completely since 2019, forcing the Tesla driver’s assistance systems to rely exclusively on the cameras, raising fears between critics.

This can also be devastating effects on the Tesla’s Robotaxi service, which has already caused a lot of chaos in the streets of Austin, Texas, although its very limited start.

This week, the shareholders sued Tesla and Musk as part of a proposed collective suit, claiming that the billionaire had hidden great risks with the company’s robots.

“I would like to say that this ruling we hope will send a very clear message to Tesla,” said Shrebar freedom After asking about the Tesla’s Robotaxi service. “They need to do better. They need to raise people’s lives and the safety of people over greed and profits.”

Schreiber is already preparing for the “second round”, a separate case in the Supreme Court in the state of Olaida, which includes the 15 -year -old boy who died in a crash in 2019 with Tesla on the automated pilot, later this year.

More about the case: “This will open the flood gates”: Tesla in trouble, as the jury orders the payment of $ 329 million after the death of the automated pilot