Biden adviser: Hunter’s presence on Supreme Court call ‘inappropriate’

According to a senior adviser to former President Joe Biden, the presence of Hunter Baiden in an invitation on the Supreme Court ruling that former presidents had some immunity from the prosecution “inappropriate”, according to a new book.

The book “2024: How Trump regained the White House and the Democrats lost America”, on Tuesday, and recounted how the Biden team refused his concerns about his age during the 2024 electoral session, along with how President Donald Trump got his victory.

The book said that the Chief of Staff of the White House, Jeff Zintis, coordinated a video call with the main Biden staff, including White House lawyer Ed Sisyle, Director of Communications Bin Labolt, and a senior advisor Mike Donilon and others to discuss whether Biden should submit a statement on the camera to the Supreme Court decision in July 2024.

The case of immunity Trump: The former Supreme Court rules enjoy a great authority of prosecution

While Donilon has already formulated a written statement, Biden wanted to talk about the issue on the camera, as the book claims. The employees in the call began to divide the details of such a look, when Ibn Biden began harmony with the call.

“Suddenly an unspecified sound from the Biden screen and recommended the title of an oval office,” the book said. “Initially, some assistants did not have any idea of ​​those who were talking. Soon it became clear that the sound belonged to Hunter Biden, whom the White House staff did not know were on the call. Sessel expressed some concern about the emergence of the use of the Oval Office.”

Scotos weighs a huge constitutional fighting on the request for immunity Trump

President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden during the Easter Egg Egg in the Southern House of the White House, April 1, 2024. (Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

“Hunter again took:” This is one of the most expensive decisions that the Supreme Court has ever made. “He said that his father had every right to use the strong pictures of the Oval Office to present that message.” “They later settled on the Cross Hall, the long corridor on the first floor of the White House. After the call ended, he told Sister, his colleagues. The presence of Hunter is inappropriate.”

Biden ultimately delivered a brief speech responding to the Supreme Court ruling and did not receive any questions from the press, according to his son’s proposal, as the book claimed.

SISKEL and Biden’s official spokesperson did not respond immediately for the comment requests from Fox News Digital.

On July 1, 2024, the Supreme Court issued a 6-3 ruling in the Trump case against the United States that former presidents had a great immunity of claiming the actions they committed in its official capacity. The case made its way to the Supreme Court after Trump faced charges caused by the investigation of the Special Adviser at the time, Jack Smith, about whether Trump was involved on January 6, 2021, and Capitol Rotol and participated in any other intervention in the elections.

Trump acknowledged that he was not guilty of all charges, and claimed that a former president was unable to prosecute without isolating the House of Representatives and condemning the Senate.

The book “Biden, for the early debate to show” Biden’s power “, says the book” Trump’s weakness “,

President Joe Biden arrives at a press conference in the wake of the Supreme Court’s ruling on charges against former President Donald Trump that he sought to sabotage the 2020 elections at the White House on July 1, 2024. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

The book “2024” is one of the many of them who were released this year, in detail, Biden’s mental deterioration while taking office and how Trump won the elections. It was composed by Josh Dossi from the Wall Street Journal, Tyler Bayer of the New York Times and Isaac Ernsdorf from the Washington Post.

Another book that covers similar materials is “OrGinal Sin: Pressident Biden’s Define, Toert, and his catastrophic choice to run again”, which was released on May 20.

Fox News Digital has written widely to the 2020 presidential campaign about Biden’s cognitive retreat and its alleged role in the interior circle in its coverage.

Click here to get the Fox News app

According to Dawi, Hunter Biden’s involvement in his father’s affairs was not an extraordinary president during the period of the former president in his post.

“What we discovered throughout the reporting of our book is that Hunter Biden (was) a major figure in the orbit of the president.” “He was often in these calls, and he would have entered the calls, and he was helping him in making the campaign decisions, and the president was very concerned about his son. He was one of the things that Arcus was while trying to run for his re -election.”