British human rights groups challenge the UK's Apple backdoor order
A couple of human rights groups indicates Financial times. Privacy International and Liberty submitted a legal complaint to the country’s Judicial Power Court (IPT), which is scheduled to hear Apple’s appeal on Friday.
The complaint argues that Apple’s appeal should be heard publicly. In addition, the group challenge claims that the government’s move violates freedom of freedom of expression and privacy for customers by forcing the company to neutralize the security of its products.
"The UK’s use of a secret order to undermine security for people all over the world is unacceptable and unparalleled," Caroline Wilson Palo, the legal director of Privacy International, said, said Caroline Wilson Palo, the legal director of Privacy International, said, ” foot. "People all over the world depend on a comprehensive encryption to protect themselves from harassment and repression. No country should have the ability to undermine this protection for everyone."
British media (including BBC, Reutersand Financial timesand Guardian More than that) I also filed complaints with IPT, on the pretext that the case should be heard publicly. As the invitation organizations, Big Brother Watch, has already been an index on censorship and the open rights group.
The UK command requires Apple from Apple to access government blankets to the encrypted private user data through the Advanced Data Protection feature (ADP). The ADP was presented at iOS 16.2 in 2022, ADP is applied to one end to the end of iCloud data such as the backup of the device, messaging content, notes and photos. Even Apple cannot reach it.
Apple removed the ADP in the UK in response to the matter before issuing its legal challenge. But since the rear door will also apply to users outside the United Kingdom, the special data for anyone with an Apple account will be weak. Security experts (and a healthy sense) warn that the back door will offer anyone who has anyone with an Apple account for foreign spying, infiltrators and hostilities.
We only know about the UK’s order due to last month. This is because it was issued under the 2016 investigation authorities law, which expanded the powers of surveillance in British intelligence and law enforcement agencies (Kassab, uh, The period of granulation, the "Sinper Charter"). The rules also prevent Apple from commenting on or publicly recognizing the existence of a respectable matter-or using their attractiveness to delay compliance. Apple said last month, "We have never built a rear door or a main key for any of our products or services, and we will never do so."
This article originally appeared on Engadget on ?
[og_img]
2025-03-14 16:33:00
