ChatGPT bans evolve into ‘AI literacy’ as colleges scramble to answer the question: ‘what is cheating?’

Secondary school teachers and colleges say that the student’s use of artificial intelligence is very dominant, that the appointment of writing outside the semester is like students to cheat.

“Fraud is out of the plans,” says Casey Kony, who taught English for 23 years. Teachers no longer wonder whether students will use external sources of school work in AI Chatbots. “Anything you send to the house, you have to assume that it’s AI’ed.”

The question now is how schools can adapt, because many teaching and evaluation tools that have been used for generations are no longer effective. Since artificial intelligence technique improves quickly and becomes more related to daily life, it works to transform how students learn and study and how teachers teach, and they create a new jamming about what constitutes the betrayal of academic trust.

“We have to ask ourselves, what is cheating?” Kony says, in the year 2024, the California Teacher Award in California. “Because I think the lines become unclear.”

Cuny students at Valencia Secondary School in southern California are now in class writing. Monitor the laptop screens for students from the desktop, using programs that allow it to “lock” their screens or prevent access to certain sites. It also integrates artificial intelligence in his lessons and teaches students how to use artificial intelligence as aid to study “to obtain children who learn with artificial intelligence instead of cheating with artificial intelligence.”

In the rural Oregon, high school teacher Kelly Gibson made a similar shift to writing in the classroom. It also merges more verbal assessments to make students speak by understanding the designated reading.

“I used to give a directive to writing and say,” within two weeks, I want an article of five paragraphs. “These days, I can’t do that. This is almost pleading with teenagers for cheating. ”

Take, for example, the task of English in the model high school: write an article that explains the importance of the social class in “The Great Gatsby”. Many students say their first instinct is now to ask Chatgpt to help “brainstorming”. Within seconds, Chatgpt gives a list of articles ideas, as well as examples and quotes to support them. Chatbot ends up asking whether he can do more: “Do you want to help write any part of the article? I can help you formulate an introduction or select a paragraph!”

Students are not sure when the use of artificial intelligence is outside the border

Students say they often turn into artificial intelligence with good intentions of things such as research, editing, or helping to read difficult texts. But Amnesty International offers unprecedented temptation, and it is sometimes difficult to know where the line is drawn.

Lily Brown, a psychologist, depends at the East Coast Liberal Arts, on Chatgpt to help identify articles because she is struggling to collect the pieces together. Chatgpt also helped her by separating a student’s philosophy, as the reading was set “I felt like a different language” to read Amnesty International’s texts.

“Sometimes I feel bad using ChatGPT to summarize reading, because I wonder, is this fraud? Does it help me to form the outlines of cheating?

Her curricula in the chapter say things like: “Do not use artificial intelligence to write articles and form ideas,” but this leaves a lot of gray area. Students say they are often ashamed to ask teachers clearly because recognition of any use of Amnesty International can suspend them as a cheat.

Schools tend to leave artificial intelligence policies for teachers, which often means that the rules vary widely within the school itself. Some teachers, for example, welcome the use of Grammarly.com, a writing auxiliary assistant, to check the rules. Others prevent it, noting that the tool also provides the rewriting sentences.

“Whether you can use artificial intelligence or not depend on every semester. It can be confused,” says Jolly, and a student of Valencia 11. She is attributed to Cuny in her education in the English language category in the second year a variety of artificial intelligence skills such as how to download study guides to ChatGPT and Chatbot to them, then explain the problems that were wrong.

But this year, its teachers have strict policies, “not Amnesty International.” Lahi says: “It is a useful tool. If we are not allowed to use it, then this does not make sense.” “It is an old feeling.”

Schools provide gradual instructions

Many schools initially banned the use of artificial intelligence after the launch of Chatgpt in late 2022. But views on the role of artificial intelligence in education had turned significantly. The term “literacy of Amnesty International” has become the word ton for the season of return to school, focusing on how to balance the strengths of artificial intelligence with its risks and challenges.

During the summer, many colleges and universities have held Amnesty International’s work teams to formulate more detailed guidelines or provide faculty with new instructions.

The University of California, Berkeley, e -mail, e -mail, to all the guidelines of the new faculty members that guided them to “include a clear statement on their approach to the session’s expectations” on the use of artificial intelligence. The guidance offered a language of three curricula curricula data – for courses that require artificial intelligence, prohibiting artificial intelligence inside and outside the separation, or allowing some use of artificial intelligence.

“In the absence of such a statement, students may be more likely to use these technologies inappropriately,” the email said, stressing that artificial intelligence “creates a new jamming about what might constitute legitimate ways to complete the work of students.”

Rebecca Fitzmimins, Chairman of the Advisory Committee for the members of the Higher Owners at Heinz College of the College and Public policy, says that the University of Carnegie Mellon has witnessed a significant increase in academic responsibility violations due to artificial intelligence, but often students do not realize that they made any mistake.

For example, one of the students learning English wrote a task in his mother tongue and used Deerl, a translation tool that works by the same AI, to translate his work into the English language. But he did not realize that the platform also changed its language, which was marked by the artificial intelligence detector.

Fitzmimins said that the enforcement of academic integrity policies has become more complicated, as it is difficult to determine the use of artificial intelligence more difficultly. The faculty members are allowed to flexibility when they believe that the student has been inadvertently crossed, but they are now more frequency in referring to violations because they do not want to accuse students in an unfair way. Students worry that if they are incorrectly accused, there is no way to prove their innocence.

Throughout the summer, FitzsimMons has helped formulate detailed new guidelines for students and faculty who strive to create more clarity. The faculty members have been informed of a comprehensive ban on artificial intelligence, “not a viable policy” unless the trainers have made changes in the way they study and evaluate students. Many faculty members get rid of home tests. She said that some have returned to pen and paper tests in the classroom, and others moved to the “inverted classroom”, where homework is done in the classroom.

Emily Dejio, who is studying communication courses at the College of Business Administration at Carnegie Mellon, has eliminated the tasks of writing as a home duty and replaced with tests inside the class on laptops in the “lock browser” that prevents students from leaving the test screen.

“The expectation of a 18 -year -old young man from the great discipline is unreasonable,” said Digio. “That is why the coaches are due to the handrails.”

___

Associated Press’s education coverage receives financial support from many private institutions. AP is the only one responsible for all content. Find AP standards to work with charitable works, a list of supporters and coverage areas funded in AP.ORG.