CivitAI in New Payment Provider Crisis, as Trump Signs Anti-Deepfake Act

President Trump has now signed the Take It Download law, as he criminalized the sexual deep at the federal level in the United States. At the same time, the CIVITAI community attempted to “clean its action” in relation to NSFW AI and Celeb ultimately failed to satisfy the payment processors, leading to the search for alternatives or closing a confrontation. All this in just two weeks since it has become the old and largest deep porn site in non -communication mode …

It was very few weeks for the state of the unorganized video and video. A little more than two weeks ago, the number 1 of the community participation of Celebrity DeepFake Porn. Mr. Deepfakes, suddenly took himself in a non -communication position more than seven years after a dominant and very studied position as a global position for celebrity content of artificial intelligence. By the time it fell, the site was receiving more than five million visits per month.

The suspension of services to Mr. Deepfakes has officially attributed the withdrawal of the “critical service provider” (see a picture of the above, which was replaced by the failure of the field within a week). However, the cooperative journalistic investigation has led to the cancellation of the identity of a major personality behind the MR.Deepfakes immediately before the closure, which allowed the site to be closed for personal and/or legal reasons for this individual.

Almost at the same time, CIVITAI, a commercial platform that is widely used for celebrities and NSFW Loras, imposed a set of unusual and controversial measures. These have affected the generation of Deepfake, hosting models, and a broader list of new rules and restrictions, including the full ban on some marginal NSFW fetish. And what he described “extremist ideologies”.

These measures have been defended by payment providers, apparently threatening to withdraw services from the field unless changes in the NSFW content and photographing artificial intelligence are made.

Civitai pieces

As of today, it appears that the measures taken by CIVITAI did not have VISA and MasterCard: a new post^† On the site, from the manager of community participation, he reveals that cards for CIVITAI (which is often operated by the virtual money system “Buzz” through credit and discount cards in the real world) from Friday (May 23, 2025).

This will prevent users from renewing the monthly membership or buying a new uproar. Although Nicole is recommended that users can maintain current organic privileges by switching to annual membership (cost^†† From 100 to $ 550) before Friday, it is clear that the future is somewhat certain for the field at this time (it should be noted that the annual membership was broadcast at the same time as the loss of payment processors was announced).

Regarding the absence of a payment processor, Nicole says “We are talking to every comfortable provider with the innovation of artificial intelligence.”.

Regarding the failure of recent efforts to rethink adequately about the site’s policies about Celeb AI and NSFW, Nicole says in the post:

“Some of the high-risk generation-Ei platforms, especially when we allow the mature content created by the user, even when it is legal and moderate. This is the choice of policy, not anything that users did, forced the pieces.

A comment from the user “FAEIA”, appointed as the company’s chief of staff in their personal file CIVITAI*, adds a context to this announcement:

Only to clarify, we are removed from the payment processor because we chose not to remove NSFW and adult content from the platform. We are still committed to supporting all types of creators and we are working on alternative solutions.

As a traditional driver of new technologies, it is not uncommon to use NSFW content to start attention to the field, technology, or statute-only to reject the initial followers once “legal capital” and/or user base (i.e., enough users to survive, when there is an occurrence in the NSFW field).

For a while, it seemed that CIVITAI would follow Tumblr and the diversity of other initiatives in this road towards a “antiseptic” product ready to forget its roots. However, the additional and increasing controversy/stigma about the content created by artificial intelligence Of any kind It represents a cumulative weight that appears to be scheduled to prevent rescue at the last minute, in this case. Meanwhile, the official announcement of users is advised to adopt Crypto as an alternative payment method.

forged

The appearance of President Donald Trump is likely to be enthusiastic about the Federal Decision Law has affected some of these events. The new law criminalizes the distribution of intimate intimate images, including Deepfakes created from artificial intelligence.

The legislation shows that the platforms remove the reported content within 48 hours, while supervising the enforcement by the Federal Trade Committee. Criminal rulings in the law immediately interfere, allowing the prosecution of individuals who intentionally publish or threaten to publish intimate images that are not approved (including Deepfakes created from artificial intelligence) within the United States.

While the law received rare support from the two parties, as well as support from technology companies and calling groups, critics argue that it may suppress the legal content and threaten privacy tools such as encryption. Last month, the Electronic Border Corporation (EFF) announced the opposition of the bill, stressing that the removal mechanisms stipulated targeting a broader set of materials than the narrower definition of intimacy intimate images that exist elsewhere in the legislation.

The removal requirement in Take It Download applies to a much wider category – any images that include intimate or sexual content – more than the narrower NCII definitions in another place in the draft law. The removal clause also lacks critical guarantees against trivial or bad removal requests.

Services depend on automatic filters, which are badly explicit tools. Often they explain the legal content, from the suspension of fair use to news reports. The narrow time frame of the law requires to remove applications and web sites within 48 hours, and the time is rarely sufficient to verify whether the speech is already illegal.

“As a result, it is possible that the online service providers, especially the youngest, are chosen to avoid arduous legal risks by simply organizing speech rather than trying to verify it.”

The platforms are now up to one year of law enacting to create an official process and notice, allowing affected individuals or their representatives to summon the statute in the search for content removal content.

This means that although criminal rulings are immediately valid, the platforms are not legally binding on compliance with infrastructure to remove infrastructure (such as receiving requests and processing) until the window breaks for one year.

Will ACT ACT cover the content of celebrities caused by artificial intelligence?

Although the Take It download law crosses all the borders of the state, it does not necessarily prohibit all the media that AI moves from celebrities. The verb criminalizes the distribution of intimate intimate images, Incurred The deep created from artificial intelligence, only when the individual had a photographer A. A reasonable expectation of privacy:

The law provides for:

(2) The crime that involves an authentic intimate visual photography.

(A) Increasing adults – except [for evidentiary, reporting purposes, etc.]It should be illegal for anyone, on the highway or foreign trade, to use an interactive computer service to deploy intimate optical imaging intentionally for an individual that can be determined not a minor if –

(1) The intimate visual imaging was obtained or created under circumstances in which a person is known, or he should know that the specified individual has reasonable expectations of privacy;

(2) What is a photographer has not been voluntarily revealed by the individual specified in a general or commercial environment [i.e., self-published porn];

(3) What is a photographer is not the issue of public attention; and

(4) Publishing intimate visual photography –

(I) aims to cause harm; or

(2) causes harm, including psychological, financial or reputation, for the specified individual.

The “reasonable anticipation of privacy” applied here did not traditionally prefer celebrity rights. Depending on the judicial precedents that appear in the end, it can even be sincere The content created by artificial intelligence, which includes general numbers in public or commercial environments, may not be included in the law.

The last item on identifying end From the flexible harmful harm legally, in this sense it does not add anything new in particular to the legislative burden. However, the intention It seems that causing damage limits the scope of action to the context of “porn revenge”, as a previous (unknown) partner publishes real or false content from another previous partner (unknown in the same level).

While the condition of “damage” to the law may seem inappropriate for cases where the anonymous users publish a photography created by AI for celebrities, it may be more important in chase scenarios, as it supports a wider pattern of inconveniences that the individual has intentionally targeted and general personality through multiple rounds.

Although the law reference to “covered platforms” excludes private channels such as signal or e -mail from their removal provisions, this exclusion applies only to commitment to the implementation of official removal procedures by May 2026. This does not mean that artificial intelligence is inconsistent or real common imaging through private communications outside the scope of criminal coordinates of the law.

It is clear that the lack of reporting mechanisms on the site does not hinder the affected parties from reporting what is now illegal content of the police; There are no such parties that prevent the use of any traditional communication methods that the site may offer to file a complaint and request the removal of violating materials.

The rights left behind

It seems that more than seven years of general criticism and media on the Deepfake content has been crowned within an unusually short period of time. However, although the Take It download law provides a sweeping firm, it may not apply in every case that involves simulator creatures created from artificial intelligence, leaving some scenarios that will be processed according to the increasing patching of DeepFake legislation at the state level, where the laws that have been passed mostly reflect “the interest. Local.

For example, in California, the Celebrity Rights Law in California limits the exclusive use of celebrity identity for themselves and their property, even after their death; On the contrary, the ELVIS Law in Tennessee focuses on protecting musicians from copying sound and unauthorized sound from AI, with each case that reflects the targeted approach to prominent interests groups at the state level.

Most states now have laws targeting sexual deep, although many of them stop clarifying whether this protection extends evenly to individuals and general numbers. Meanwhile, the political state that helped stimulate Donald Trump’s support for the new federal law, in practice, may be against the constitutional barriers in certain contexts.

^† Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20250520024834/https://civitai.com/articles/14945

^†† The archived version (not characterized by monthly prices): https://web.archive.org/web/20250425020325/https://civitai.green/pring

* The actual “Chief of Staff” of the CEO of CIVITAI is listed in LinkedIn under an unrelated name, while the similar “faiona” is the intermediary of the official CIVITAI staff in the field.

It was first published on Tuesday 20 May 2025