What to know about Cory Booker’s all-night speech

The democratic base of weeks in Democrats in Congress has suffered to “fight” and stand for President Donald Trump.

Senator Korea Booker, DN.J. Treat this through his night speech, wandering against Trump and Eileon Musk.

What you also see is the battle of an agent of the final battle behind the minority leader in the Senate Chuck Schumer, DN.Y. Shomer will not be expelled any time soon, but the moves like this by Booker are the ways made by members of the Senate with high aspirations and win their colleagues.

Booker delivers the marathon speech in the Senate against Trump, the supervisor, Elon Musk: “Hold a lot of harm”

The late Senate Leader Harry Reed gave Nif. , A trunk similar to a speech when the whip was. This won Reed Balnni from his democratic colleagues.

Booker began speaking around 7 pm East on Monday. The question is whether this constitutes “filibuster” or just a really long speech. From the parliament’s point of view, the long speech does not necessarily constitute a filling.

Filibuster is used to prevent or delay something on the ground, and it may not require a speech at all. Sometimes the Philistry is misunderstood, thanks to Hollywood and “Mr. Smith goes to Washington.”

Technically, Booker does not delay anything. The Senate had no suspension discussion or vote to reach an immediate. Therefore, it is actually not filibuster. It is just a long speech.

Republicans in the House of Representatives to go to war with the “rogue judges” who prevent the Trump agenda: Here is their plan

Senator Cori -Booker listens as a candidate for the United States Supreme Court, Kitanji Brown Jackson, during her confirmation session before the Senate Judicial Committee on March 22, 2022 in Washington. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The Senate voted last night to overcome a correspondent for Matt Whitaker’s nomination to become an ambassador to NATO. According to the ruling, the opponents have up to 30 hours to burn before the Senate voted to confirm it. The Senate Witik was expected to confirm today, but this vote was not yet on the books. Therefore, Booker had technically until Wednesday morning on Wednesday. According to the ruling, the Senate will automatically vote on Whitaker. For this reason, this was not technically.

The Senate allows almost unlimited discussion, so Booker benefits from this privilege.

If Booker wants to keep the ground, it should remain standing at all times. Otherwise, it can lose control of the ground.

Note that Booker did not speak all the time. Senator Chris Murphy, D-Kun, gave Booker periodic time. Murphy himself gave a speech overnight about weapons in 2016. He is also a person watching him as a possible successor to Sumer.

Senator Chris Murphy speaks during a press conference after the weekly policy lunch for Democrats at the American Capitol Building on January 21, 2025 in Washington. (Samuel Corome/Getty Emose)

In order to maintain the ground, Boker sometimes delivered Murphy to a question. The return of a “question” allows a Senate member to control the ground. After that, Murphy Booker ordered by giving some somewhat long speeches – so long that there is a question at the end.

In terms of the Senate, this is similar to the invitation of the relief jug of the bull to a mixture or two. Type like a double key. In the baseball game, the manager sometimes pulls a jug, comes from a bull and puts an original jug in the player’s position – then returns them to the hill after the mixture. This maintains the original jug in the game.

Thus, Booker is still “in the game”.

The late Senator Strom Thormond, RS.C. The record for the longest deficiency: 24 hours and 18 minutes on civil rights legislation in 1957.

Click here to get the Fox News app

However, Filibuster Thurmond was “with the help of wind.” There was no television or social media. Most of the correspondents did not realize that he was on the ground all night until the next day. Leave the ground to use the bathroom. Get a sandwich. The majority leader of the Senate Lindon Johnson, D-TEXAS, allowed the passes of laws unanimously and divided the new Senate member.

But because the watchful eyes were not on the Senate, no one was called Thormond.