GOP Rep Andrew Clyde unveils impeachment articles against Judge John McConnell

First on the fox: The Republican Representative of Georgia Andrew Claid officially offers his articles against the dismissal against Rudd Island, who previously ordered the Trump administration to cancel the federal funds.

Articles, which participated for the first time with Fox News Digitter, shares the province’s judge in the United States John James McConneel Junior by abuse of power and conflicts of interests, saying that he “politicized and weapons his judicial position to push his political views and beliefs.”

If Maconel is convicted of such charges, he must be removed from his position.

Skop: The dismissal articles were affected

McConnell is currently overseeing a lawsuit filed by 22 states and province of Colombia, which challenges the Trump administration to block federal grant funds. After McConnell ordered the administration to comply with a restricted order, the government appealed to the first circle – which refused to stay on orders.

“The American people voted overwhelmingly for President Trump in November, providing a clear mandate to make our federal government more efficient,” Klaid told Fox News Digital. “However, Judge McConnell, who will benefit from his Al -Zarji matter, is trying to hinder the president’s agenda on one side and challenge the will of the American people. Judge McConnell’s actions are corrupt and dangerous and deserved isolation.”

Trump’s allies argue that the court order prevents deportations “unconstitutional obstacles”

Judge John James McConnell, inserted, heads a lawsuit against the Trump administration by 22 states and province of Colombia challenges the administration’s actions to obtain grants for grants. (Getty)

Claide announced plans to formulate the dismissal articles in early February, after McConnell ordered the Trump administration to re -grant grants and federal loans. Articles adding the formal character to the fees.

McConnell has also been criticized by Trump supporters and conservatives in recent weeks after the appearance of the 2021 video, in which the courts have warned The rule of law … against arbitrary and volatile measures by what could be overwhelming or could be what. ”

Articles indicate that the video, claiming that McConnell “allowed his personal and political views to influence his decisions and provisions”, and that he showed “a bias that would distort his decision” in the issue of federal freezing.

In a statement, Club said that “judicial activity” is “the latest form of Lawfare”.

Reporter book: Empeachapalooza here to stay

The dismissal articles carried out by Representative Andrew Klide come a few days after his colleague at Republican Party Brandon Jill, R-TEXAS, came to the left, his own articles against the American boycott judge James Boa, insert. (Getty Images)

“congress bears the responsibility and constitutional authority to attend the active judges responsible through the dismissal,” he continued. “I salute my colleagues to hold other rogue judges, and I hope to see quick procedures on this decisive issue in the House of Representatives soon.”

Upon calling, the court refused to comment.

The accounting decision to Clyid follows a similar step by Representative Brandon Jill, R-TEXAS, who earlier made articles from the judge against the US District Court, James Boasberg. The Federal Judge in Washington, DC, is overseeing a separate case that challenges President Donald Trump’s use of wartime law in the eighteenth century to deport the Venezuelan citizens to El Salvador, who were linked to the violent gang Treen de Aragua.

Click here to get the Fox News app

Gil Boasberg is accused of misusing his authority by stopping the deportation order under Law 1789.

The escalating criticism of the judges of the minimum judgment against the Trump administration, President of the United States Supreme Court, John Roberts, pushed an unusual statement in response to this month.

“For more than two centuries, it has been proven that the dismissal is not an appropriate response to the dispute regarding a judicial decision,” said Roberts. “There is a regular appeal review process for this purpose.”

Elizabeth Elkind of Fox News Digital contributed to this report.