DOJ, Google spar over ‘illegal monopoly,’ remedies in landmark antitrust case

Lawyers of the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Justice appeared in front of a federal judge on Monday to start the trial procedures in the case of a teacher to combat monopoly – those that will be determined to what extent should Google go to dismantle the search engine on the monopoly.

A high risk trial, scheduled to play in court over the next three weeks, can change the fate of one of the most obvious Silicon Valley giants.

The Ministry of Justice and Google will provide remedial means to resolve what the American boycott judge, Amit Mihit, last summer is the illegal Google monopoly in the online search engine space.

The result of the so -called “Treatment Experience” can be determined the future of the Google search engine, or the driving power of the company with a value of $ 1.8 trillion. The lawyer of the Ministry of Justice David Dackest stated on Monday to abide by its previous framework because it is looking to dismantle Google’s dominance in the online search engine sector.

Federal judges in New York and Texas prevent Trump’s deportation after the rule of Scotos

“The illegal Google behavior has created an economic gallot, which causes ruin in the market to ensure that – regardless of what is happening – Google always wins.”

On Monday, they argued that the Google search engine grew to control the Internet to a large extent by pushing the company to web browsers and some smartphone manufacturers as a way to clarify the competition.

The Ministry of Justice asked the court that Google should be required to sell its Chrome browser, share years of consumer data with competitors, and sell the Google smartphone operating system.

The two said that these steps can prevent Google from obtaining a monopoly in the space of artificial intelligence – while acknowledging that technology will develop, and therefore it should “must” include the ability to develop alongside it as well. “

The president of the Supreme Court, Roberts, is invalidated to save the Trump shooting decision

Google logo in Skyscraper in the city center. (Roberto Machado Noa / LightrockTy via Getty Images / Getty Images)

“The treatment of this court should be aspiring and does not ignore what is on the horizon,” Dackest said to the court.

For its part, Google suggested a suggestion of the narrowest treatments.

The company’s lawyers told the court on Monday that the proposed Ministry of Justice framework will be a backward treatment, and that one of them said that it suffocates innovation and fails to regulate the anti -competition behavior that was identified.

They have repeated that it could cause real damage to Google’s innovative services, such as Mozilla Firefox.

Kent Walker, Vice President of Global Participation at Google, told Fox News Digital before the session, that the plan is “Miles behind” the relief requested by Judge Mihita, Kent Walker, Vice President of Global Participation in Google, before the session.

“They do not withstand a slim or non -existent relationship with anti -competition, and they violate the law,” Google argued.

The Supreme Court freezes an order to return the man from El Salvador prison

In Brussels, Belgium, on March 21, 2023, the Google Bard web page appears on the screen with Google AI on the mobile phone during the launch. (Jonathan Raa / Nurphoto via Getty Images / Getty Images)

Google’s executive officials have also referred to concerns about the scope of consumer data that can be forced to participate with their competitors under the framework of the treatments submitted by the Ministry of Justice – including both American companies and foreign competitors – and indicated fears that the amount of joint data in the proposal by the Ministry of Justice would present new risks to the privacy of consumer and national security.

Their options to the court include shorter contracts for browser companies, Like apples And Mozilla. New contracts with Android, to allow additional flexibility and download option before multiple search engines; And other important steps to make the scene more competitive.

The two sides are expected to continue in the battle about treatments in the coming weeks, and Judge Mihata is expected to rule on the case by June.

Click here to get the Fox News app

Meanwhile, both sides are scheduled to hear a certificate of long lists of witnesses, including senior officials.

Google Lawyers said on Monday that they are planning to contact the CEO of Google, Sundar Pichai, as a witness in the case next week.