Politics

Conservative legal experts slam judge’s ruling on anti-Israel activist

A federal judge said on Wednesday that the Trump administration’s efforts to deport Mahmoud Khalil may be unconstitutional, but some conservative legal experts do not buy it.

Khalil is a pro -Palestine and anti -Israel activist who led the protests at Columbia University. The immigration judge recently said that he could be deported, but the American boycott judge Michael Varberaz for New Jersey province said that it is likely to be rejected as “mysterious, unconstitutional.” However, Khalil will remain in the reservation.

“The District Court held what we already knew: a secretary [of State Marco] Lawyers of Khalil said after the judge’s ruling: “The Rubio weapon of the Immigration law to punish Mahmoud and others is likely to be unconstitutional.”

The federal judge says that the attempt to deport the leader of the anti -Israel player, Mahmoud Khalil, may be unconstitutional

The anti -Israeli activist Mahmoud Khalil deleted the Trump administration case against him in the Washington Post column this week. (Selcuk Acar/Anadolu via Getty Images | Reuters/Shannon Stableton)

However, different legal experts differ with the judge.

“Only a Hamas judge handed over a victory over American soil. Mahmoud Khalil lied to our country, hidden his relations with a foreign system, then led a pro -enthusiastic acquisition at Columbia University. Now, the judicial activist wants to remove threats like threats such as hacking threats such as flammable threats. Digital in a statement.

Click here for more immigration coverage

“The Supreme Court has clarified this authority.

A lawsuit for freedom of expression against freedom of expression against freedom of expression must be heard against freedom of expression raised to the leader of freedom of expression in freedom of expression raised.

Foreign Minister Marco Rubio witnesses

Foreign Minister Marco Rubio is witnessing at the hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in the Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on May 20. (Reuters/Jonathan Ernest)

“By declaring the Immigration and Nationality Law” unconstitutionally vague, “Judge Versarraz does not explain the law – that he rewrites.

“A ridiculous claim, in indisputability by a federal judge,” said Hans von Spacovsky, a senior legal colleague at the Heritage Corporation, and said that although Keleh is a legal resident in the United States, he can still face consequences.

“Foreigners have no constitutional right in the United States, moreover, according to the Federal Immigration Law, 8 USC 1227, foreigners such as Khalil, including permanent resident foreigners, if the foreigner“ faces or adopts terrorist activity “or supports a“ terrorist organization. ”He said that Khalil’s blatant support for Hamas, a dedicated terrorist organization, makes him immediately deported.

Lawyers of the anti -Israel activists Mahmoud Khalil explodes Rubio’s evidence: “Two pages, this is all”

Supporters of supporters of Hamas Mahmoud Khalil, the protest outside the Federal Court

People are gathering to protest to support Mahmoud Khalil before a federal court in Newark, New Jersey, on March 28. (Stephanie Keith in favor of Fox News Digital)

The White House also condemned the verdict, and continued its repeated confrontations with federal judges over the immigration policy.

Click here to get the Fox News app

“Mahmoud Khalil was granted the concession to come to America to study, but he wasted that opportunity by bending with Hamas terrorists, organizing protests that disrupted the college classes and harassing American Jewish students.

This report contributed to this report, Anders News Fox News, contributed to this report.

Don’t miss more hot News like this! Click here to discover the latest in Politics news!

2025-05-29 22:45:00

Related Articles

Back to top button