What’s in the Jeffrey Epstein grand jury transcripts?

Lawyer Sarah Krisov, an American lawyer in Manhattan from 2008 to 2021, called for the request for prosecutions for Ibstein and his British Social Prison, Gisslain Maxwell, “Divation”.

“The president is trying to present himself as if he was doing something here and he is in fact not something,” Kriseov told Associated Press in an interview with the weekend.

The Deputy Prosecutor Todd Blanche submitted the request on Friday, and asked the judges to cancel the texts from the procedures of the major jury, which led to accusations against Epstein and Maxwell, saying, “The transparency of the American public has the utmost importance in this administration.”

The request came at a time when the administration sought to contain the fiery storm that followed its announcement that it would not issue additional files from the Epstein probe despite the promise previously.

I Ibstin died while Maxwell is serving a 20 -year prison sentence

Epstein was killed at the age of 66 in his federal prison in August 2019, a month after he was arrested for sex trafficking, while Maxwell, 63, is serving a 20 -year prison sentence after being convicted of sex trafficking in December 2021 to misuse girls by Ibstin.

Krisov and Joshua Navatis, a federal public prosecutor in Manhattan for 11 years before entering special practice in 2023, said that the great jury’s offers are short.

Naftalis said that the prosecutors in the southern province are providing enough to the Great Persons Authority to obtain an indictment, but “will not be all that the FBI and investigators of Maxwell and Opstein have discovered.”

He said: “People want the entire file in the long run. This is not what it is.”

“It will not be much,” Krisov said, as it was estimated at length of at least 60 pages, “because the southern boycott of New York is to put a little information in the form of major jury.”

She said: “They are essentially feeding the indictment to the major jury. This is what we will see,” she said. “I think it will not be interesting … I don’t think it will be something new.”

Former mentors say that the major jury version is unlikely to be long

Each of the former analysts said that the witnesses of the major jury in Manhattan are usually federal clients summarizing their witnesses.

This practice may conflict with the general awareness of some of the governmental and federal jury procedures, where witnesses who are likely to witness a trial before major jury bodies are presented during long procedures before using the accusation regulations or when major jury bodies are used as an investigation tool.

In Manhattan, Federal Public Prosecutors are trying to obtain a certain result, so they present the case very distress and inform the Greater Persons in what they want to do, “Krisov said.

Kriseov predicted that the judges who headed Epstein and Maxwell would refuse the government’s request.

With Maxwell, a petition is submitted to the United States Supreme Court, so the appeal has not been exhausted. With Epstein, the charges are linked to the Maxwell case and his identity was not disclosed from dozens of victims who were not above the test, although Blanche demanded the protection of the identities of the victims.

“This is not the issue of 50, 60 and 80 years,” Krisov noted. “There is still a detained person.”

Ruling on the Court of Appeal in 1997 may matter

She said that “public conspiracies, interest and excitement” probably was not sufficient to persuade the judge to release the texts despite the 1997 ruling from the Court of Appeal in the second American circle, which stated that the judges have a wide discretionary authority and that the public interest alone can justify the launch of the information of the major jury.

Kriseov described it as “very strange” that the Washington Ministry officials are directly submitting requests and arguments in the southern province in New York, where the prosecutor’s office was classified as a “sovereign area in New York” for a long time for its independence from the external influence.

She said: “That the public prosecutor and vice -prosecutor should interfere in the SDNY case that no one has heard of.”

Sherrill Bader, a former public prosecutor in Federalism and a professor of criminal law at the Fordam Law College, said that the judges who headed Epstein and Maxwell may take weeks or months to judge.

She said: “Especially here when the case included witnesses or victims of sexual assault, and many of them below the legal age, the judge will be very cautious about what the judge issued.”

The traditions of the major jury securion may prevent the release of texts

Badr said that she did not see the endeavor aimed at satisfying the public’s desire to explore the theories of conspiracy, “pardoning the pun-pardoning the pun-the established concepts to protect the confidentiality of the major jury.”

She added: “I am sure that all prosecutors who appreciate the confidentiality and the special relationship that links them with the Grand jury are not happy because the Ministry of Justice asks the court to release these texts.”

Mitchell Ebiner, former public prosecutor, now called on a special practice, Trump’s comments and its impact on the I Ibstein’s “unprecedented” issue and “unusual unusual” because he is the head of sitting.

He said that it is not surprising that some former prosecutors were concerned that the request to cancel the major jury materials came two days after the shooting of an American lawyer in Manhattan, Mourin Kumi, who worked in the cases of Epstein and Maxwell.

He said: “If the federal prosecutors should worry about the professional consequences to refuse to communicate with the political or personal agenda of powerful people, then we are in a completely different place than I understood that the Federal Ministry of Justice over the past thirty years of my career.”

Krisov said that the unconfirmed environment that raises the feeling of current public prosecutors to participate by government employees who are talking to them in other agencies as part of its work in private practice.

She said: “The thing I hear most of the time is that this is a strange time. Things do not do the way we are used to doing.”