Politics

Iran Can Already Build a Dirty Bomb With Its Uranium

There is a continuous discussion about the relapse of the Iranian nuclear program that it witnessed during its recent conflict with Israel and the United States. But there is no doubt that Iran has already has enough nuclear materials to make a radiological weapon known as a dirty bomb. The question is whether it has sufficient strategic motivation to try to build – and use – like the device.

Michael Robin, a former US Defense Department official and is now an older colleague at the American Projects Institute, warned of the latest opening. If Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamani, “wants to fulfill his threats, then his next step is to hit Israel with dirty bombs to spread radiation on large sections of its urban areas.”

There is a continuous discussion about the relapse of the Iranian nuclear program that it witnessed during its recent conflict with Israel and the United States. But there is no doubt that Iran has already has enough nuclear materials to make a radiological weapon known as a dirty bomb. The question is whether it has sufficient strategic motivation to try to build – and use – like the device.

Michael Robin, a former US Defense Department official and is now an older colleague at the American Projects Institute, warned of the latest opening. If Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamani, “wants to fulfill his threats, then his next step is to hit Israel with dirty bombs to spread radiation on large sections of its urban areas.”

In an interview with NPR with NPR, Mark Warner, the pioneering democracy of the Senate Intelligence Committee, expressed his concerns: “How do we make sure that Iran is now not now to a dirty bomb?

The dirty bomb is not a nuclear weapon but rather a “radiological dispersion” consisting of standard explosive, such as dynamite, in conjunction with a radioactive substance, such as Cisium -137, which is usually used in the treatment of cancer; Cobalt 60, in industrial radiography; And other things used in Iran, as in most modern states, for medical and industrial use.

Such a weapon is spreading a tremendous panic if used. But every expert Foreign policy However, she said that it would classify Iran as an outcast, perhaps even among its allies, including Moscow and Beijing. Andreas Craig, the first lecturer at Kings College London for Security Studies, said that if Iran will build and publish it, it will reach “strategic suicide.”

In The Hague last month, US President Donald Trump expressed his personal evaluation that Iran had completed its nuclear program after the bombing of American nuclear sites. However, Iran has not yet said anything that confirms this belief. It has not yet agreed to abandon its nuclear program or reduce the enrichment of uranium to zero. However, Trump threatened that if Iran does not give up its nuclear ambitions, the attacks may resume its nuclear infrastructure.

In such a scenario – especially if the attacks are ascending to include the threat of changing the system or endangering a raw life, it is possible, if it is unlikely, that the Iranian strategists consider it worth building a dirty bomb. This can be a matter of simply combining very enriched uranium with traditional explosives. (Although other radioactive materials are less valuable from medical and industrial sources available more easily and can be used instead.)

Iran will then need to determine how to spread the bomb. Some experts suggest that Iran can use such a bomb against Iran through agents in the Palestinian territories or transfer it to the United States through the Hezbollah Network in the countries of Latin America, to the Persian Gulf states through the shared vast coasts, or to Europe despite the shipment of containers or via land paths through East Bousing.

The dirty bomb will not qualify as a weapon of comprehensive destruction (WMD), but its potential to cause vast disorder. Experts said that the extent of damage depends on the amount of traditional explosives that are filled, and not on radioactive materials, because the explosion itself is not subject to fission. But it is difficult to measure the resulting psychological terrorism resulting from the dispersion of radioactive materials.

“If you detonate this device, you will have traces on a traditional bomb, which may be very bad, of course, but radioactivity will be on a very small space and will not cause victims,” ​​said Pavel Bodevig, a prominent researcher at the United Nations Institute for Research Research Research Research Research Research Research. “But pollution, yes, panic.” The hysteria effects and economic turmoil can be. Property pollution can lead to evacuation and takes a long time and cost to clean. Online misinformation can increase panic.

“The nuclear bomb creates a stronger explosion of a dirty bomb. The radiation cloud can spread from a nuclear bomb dozens of square miles, while the dirty bomb can be dispersed within a few blocks or miles of the explosion,” according to the American Nuclear Organization Committee.

“The dirty bomb is not WMD,” said Marion Mimer, a nuclear weapons expert in Chatham House. “WMDS is called like the intense effect that it will cause … … a nuclear weapon that shakes stability and unleashes destroy. Radio activity is much higher than just the dispersion of some radioactive materials,” as in a dirty bomb. “WMDS range and size is much larger – whether it is nuclear, biological or chemical weapons.”

Experts said that talking about the possibility of making Iran and using a dirty bomb causes more tension and unintentionally expanding the leverage to the Iranian regime, which was weakened by Israel’s American attacks. They added that the deployment of such weapons would inflict a very reputable, political and military cost to Iran, which exposes itself as a reasonable and valid country that is fighting just because of its sovereign rights.

“Iran can build a dirty bomb – so Germany can. Any modern country can,” Mimer said. “But my question is why we assume he wants it?” She added that Iran is currently considering its options and is likely to go to a secret program to build a nuclear deterrent, instead of a weapon linked to terrorist groups.

Others said that Iran could publish its groups that weakened, but it survived the Israeli attacks or even a new group to transport and detonate a dirty bomb, but any such activity will be followed, especially since some higher intelligence agencies are watching every step Iran. Ultimately, the link will be established and likely to be a wider military response from the United States.

Moreover, the use of such a weapon can incite a regional crisis as the Gulf states feel threatened, and despite China’s rapprochement between its leadership and Tehran, the aggravation of anxiety. Even friends in the region, such as Qatar and the favorable electoral districts in Iraq and Lebanon can turn against Iran, where they see it as a very far step or feel panic if the radiological activity is spilled into Arab lands. At home, the fear of the return of war, more punitive penalties, may lead to poor system and encourage people to move to the streets.

In calculating the differentiation and integration of risks and interest, a dirty bomb falls badly. It is a loser proposal for a country that managed to avoid a full war and its heart at the hands of a superior military force-sometimes because of the fear that if there is a country of 92 million annoying, it will have long-term consequences.

The main reason, perhaps, is that the Iranian regime does not look at a dirty bomb after that it is more than ever, it sees an actual nuclear bomb as a reliable deterrent. North Korea sees an example of a follow -up, instead of the Libyan Gaddafi, who got rid of his nuclear program and was attacked by the West, taller at the end and killed.

It remains that instead of retracting the idea of ​​a dirty bomb, Iran can build a traditional nuclear weapon using enriched uranium stocks that it already has – assuming it successfully hidden it from the Israeli attack and the United States. Although fertilization of 90 percent is often mentioned as the required level for converting uranium into an applicable device, this indicates what is required for advanced and encouraging missile warheads. A traditional nuclear bomb can be built larger than the old model and is much larger than the 60 percent of Uranium Iran.

Don’t miss more hot News like this! Click here to discover the latest in Politics news!

2025-07-08 15:27:00

Related Articles

Back to top button