Could This Be the First Real Guardrail on Artificial Intelligence?

senator Josh Holie and Richard Blumentel again given to the spotlight from artificial intelligence, this time with a draft law aimed at creating a federal program to assess the risks of advanced artificial intelligence systems.

According to axios, Artificial Intelligence Risk Assessment Law It would create a program in the Ministry of Energy to collect data on potential artificial intelligence disasters – think about rogue systems, security violations, or weapons by opponents.

It looks almost like science fiction, but the concerns are very real.

Here is Kicker: Developers will be asked to present their models for review before publishing.

This is a sharp contradiction with “moving quickly and breaking things”. Silicon Valley talisman. He reminds me of how, just a few months ago, California passed a naked law of artificial intelligence that focuses on consumer safety and transparency.

Both efforts indicate a broader movement – the government finally stressing the affairs of the technology that was going before the organization.

What really surprised me is how this batch became. You believed that Holie and a diploma will agree on a little, but here they sing the same tone about the dangers of artificial intelligence.

It is not their first Rodio. Earlier this year, they collaborated on a proposal to protect the content of the symmetrical copies created by the artificial intelligence of their work.

Obviously, they see Amnesty International as a double-border sword-opposite to creativity and chaos equally.

But here is the place that becomes chaotic. The White House indicated that excessive organization may discourage innovation and put the United States in the artificial intelligence race with China.

This tightening the rope-safety for speed-what I heard at the last Snapdragon summit, where the chip makers were boasting of the laptops that AI and AULC-EI excessive as was the following industrial revolution.

The world of technology is moving forward, and policymakers are scrambling to catch up with.

Here’s my year: It is a refreshing to see the legislators at least try to wrestling with these questions before the disaster strikes.

Certainly, such bills will not suit everything, and may slow down a few delinquent players.

But can we really carry another “social media moment” where we only realize the risks after the damage?

I would like to claim that logical censorship, as this proposal suggests, is less than suffocating progress and more than that of ensuring that progress does not return to us.

So, what next? If the draft law acquires this traction, we can see that the Ministry of Energy becomes an unexpected gatekeeper for the safety of artificial intelligence.

And if it fades, well, the silicon valley gets longer. Either way, there is one clear thing: Artificial intelligence has officially moved from technical blogs to the Senate Hall, and no longer.