Meta Made a Wild Screwup in the Documents It Showed in Court

Mark Zuckerberg Meta made a big mistake.

Or more accurately, a group of huge errors, which drew the wrath of lawyers for Meta Apple, Google and Snapchat.

The case is that during the last stage of the trial of anti -monopoly, Meta’s lawyers presented slices that reveal the information they bear on other companies. Although it was technically revised, the details of the third party collected by Meta were available by anyone with the file – because the updates were easily reflected.

Fortunately, the information that was disclosed was not exactly nuclear secrets – users of one slice of Hat Hat iPhone prefer Apple Correspondent application on Meta, for each Freedom – But the lawyers of other companies say that this is not the point: it is that the company the size of the definition should not be treated with sensitive court documents, so what is the machine, with this absolute disregard.

Snapchat’s lawyer “CAVALERER and informal ignorance”, according to, criticized, according to freedomHe wondered whether Meta would have applied meaningful revision if her own information was at stake. ” Meanwhile, implicit for Apple consultants that they may not trust in its internal documents with Meta to go forward.

Meta has already been arrested in an attempt to take advantage of the user data to spy on the Snapchat platform, a strategy called by the company “Ghostbusters”. He was also struck by raging huge data in 2019, when personal information leaked from about 533 million users on Facebook after the attackers discovered a defect in the internal security of the platform.

The company’s last privacy comes in the middle of an equivalent case to combat monopoly submitted by the Federal Trade Committee (FTC), which says Meta is usually usually in buying competitors such as Instagram, WhatsApp, Threads and Oculus instead of competing with them seriously.

Among other things, FTC is trying to prove that the attempt to purchase Meta for Snapchat – a displayed offer in 2013, to Zuckerberg’s dissatisfaction – is a record measure of the social media giant.

In the recent disclosure of public relations, Meta raised that “the weak FTC issue against Meta ignores the reality”, on the pretext that the company’s social media competitors exceed Snapchat, so trying to buy it is not a big problem.

“Evidence in the trial will show what he knows every year in the world in the world,” read a dead report, “Instagram is competing with Tiktok (YouTube, X and many other applications).”

Meta is not alone in the face of scrutiny for monopolistic practices.

A federal judge recently stood up to the Ministry of Justice in a claim that Google was running a monopoly on the Internet, a ruling that could shake the web in a big way. FTC takes the same as Amazon to the mission on the anti -monopoly land, although this experience may now be late after Dog has canceled rental contracts in some offices of the Trade Committee.

More on definition: Zuckerberg Court tells that Facebook is no longer about communicating with friends