Creator of “AI Actress” Responds to Near-Universal Backlash

Will cinema pioneers accept films created using artificial intelligence? And most importantly, will the designs that work in this industry be great while leaving technology playing a heavy role in the film industry process?

The bitter response to the new “Actress of Amnesty International” indicates that the answer to both questions, at least at the present time, is “no”.

On Sunday, the creator of digital acting called “Tele Norwood” defended her ideas after everyone said to a large extent that they hate her – including, most notably the actors.

“For those who expressed their anger at the creation of the artificial intelligence character, Tele Norwood, it is not a substitute for man, but it is a creative work – an artistic piece,” Ellienn Van der Fellan, the AI ​​FIRM Productions 6 Foundation, said in a statement posted on Instagram. “Like many forms of art in front of it, it raises conversation, and this in itself indicates the strength of creativity.”

The role of Norwood comes in Crosshairs, where the main film studios have rushed impatiently to sign deals with artificial intelligence companies. Last year alone witnessed the effects of the generation used in a number of prominent films, starting from “Alien: Romulus” to “The Brutalist”.

The artificial intelligence character sparked a violent violent reaction last week when Van Der Veelden claimed that she recently formed a “talent studio” of artificial intelligence “Xicoia” in talks with agents who were interested in signing it. “We will announce the agency that you will represent in the next few months,” Delivery date.

The artificial intelligence doll, which is considered a controversial “actress”, is in itself. But it seems that talking about the character of artificial intelligence as an actual performance that has been signed seems to be a very tangible threat to real actors, who fought to protect artificial intelligence in the SAG-Aftra strike for the year 2023 that closed Hollywood for about half a year.

“It is not actually actress,” the young TV star Nicolas Alexander Chavez wrote in response to the news. “Nice attempt.”

“And what about hundreds of young women, whose faces were formed together to make them?” Actress Mara Wilson, who was famous for her role in the movie “Matilda” in 1996. “Can’t you rent any of them?”

Veteran actor Ralph Einson summarized the general feeling of a viral tweet.

“F*CK Off”, Books.

Van der Veelden, a comedian and actress, tried to address the actors’ reaction by claiming that Norwood is not here for their jobs.

“I do not see Amnesty International as an alternative to people, but as a new tool, a new brush,” she wrote in the statement.

Van Der Veelden added that artificial intelligence figures “must be judged as part of this special type”, instead of comparing them to human actors. “It represents the experience, not the replacement.”

This did not do much to enhance her case.

Actor Abraham Lim wrote, “Saying that this is not an attempt to replace humans is stupid and shields from SH*T.” “The presence of” Tile “, is likely to sign with an agency, and use them in any production – these actions, in itself, replace actors and other actresses.”

It is a fair point. If the creation of Van Der Veelden does not replace humans and should not be judged through the same criteria, then why is it strengthened by holy terms publicly? She calls Norwood as “Amnesty International actress”, not a digital figure. It is represented by the “AI Talent Studio”, not a technical company. Norwood has a “her” page on Instagram, as it disguises as a typical or famous influence.

Van der Veelden says its creation is a “Sparks conversation”, but this is not an indication of creativity or artistic merit. In this case, that conversation was a semi -global flow of anger. This does not tell us anything unique or insightful. This only means that no one loves her. Also, there are ways to withdraw a trick like this that does not already includes obtaining an “signed” Amnesty International by agents or studios, mixing directly with the lives of the body and talent in the blood.

And if Norwood represents “experience”, it is certain that it is not the artistic type. Everyone knows that artificial intelligence can dream of imitating humans. Anging the Human Form, and the art we create, is his entire point of view. The status of “Amnesty International actress” there – which is nicely realistic and safely adheres to traditional beauty standards – does not even feel the experimental way in any way. It simply enhances the ability of technology to generate boring simulation, and thus makes everyone whose creative output is average in clay moved by the algorithm feels very uncomfortable about their future.

More about artificial intelligence: Lionsgate has collapsed to create films using artificial intelligence in a disaster