AI deepfakes could drive up divorce costs, threaten evidence in court

Americans looking to settle divorce and obtain custody of their children can raise the costs of the unexpected court by trying to refute videos, photos and documents created in artificial intelligence (AI).

Michel O’Neil, co -founder of the Dallas -based Owlawys, told the courts that the courts are “real increase” in fake evidence, which was repeatedly created with artificial intelligence. She said that the problem has become more common and judges are taught in schools and conferences to stay awake.

One type of wrong evidence is a revenge porn created from artificial intelligence-including fake pictures and videos of individuals who participate in intimate works. O’Neill notes that although Deepfakes have primarily stormed the news when it affects celebrities, the case also affects ordinary citizens who suffer from the disintegration or suggestion of divorce through the Family Court.

Most small companies use artificial intelligence

The use of artificial intelligence to create fake photos and videos can lead to the costs of customers working on their way through divorce. (Istock/Kirill KudryavTsev/AFP via Getty Images/Getty Images)

O’Neill’s claim on these types of content that was created from artificial intelligence supports “explosion on the scene” by statistics that show that the spread of Deepfake videos, not including photographs, rose 900 % on an annual basis since 2019.

“When the customer gives me evidence, I must wonder about my customers more than ever where I got it? How did you get it? You know, where did he come from?” O’Neel said.

The problem also affects an overwhelming majority on women. Sensity Ai has constantly found that between 90 % and 95 % of all deep online actions are unusual porn. About 90 % of this number is the non -vertical porn for women.

Despite the amazing number, O’Neill says social media platforms are slow to behave.

First Lady Melania Trump talked about the Capitol Hill in early March for the first time since her return to the White House, and participated in a round table with legislators and victims of revenge in porn and deep organization.

congress is currently the individual to punish the abuse of the Internet that involves uniform and explicit images.

Artificial intelligence fraud spreads. A new tool that tries to fight them

The green wire model covers the actor’s lower face while creating a video of the face installation, known as Deepfake, in London, Britain, February 12, 2019. (Reuters TV / Reuters / Reuters)

Take It Download is a draft law presented in the Senate by Sens. Ted Cruz, R-TEXAS, Amy Klobuchar, D-MINN. , It would make a federal crime to publish or threaten to spread unusual intimate images, including the “digital counterfeit” made of artificial intelligence. The draft law unanimously approved the Senate earlier in 2025, when Cruz said on Monday that he believed it would be passed by the House of Representatives before the law became.

While the government pushes new laws, O’Neill says that the usual artificial intelligence to create a frank and frank content remains a “actual threat” to the judicial system.

“The integrity of our judicial system is very dependent on the integrity of the evidence that you can enter and attend. If you cannot even rely on the integrity of the evidence that is presented to the judge, if the judge cannot even rely on the integrity of the evidence they receive – our judicial system may be fully at the existence of virtual intelligence.”

O’Neil, from artificial intelligence, is observed negatively affecting the Americans who have stabbed economically and who fell prey to the fraudulent court evidence. Now, an individual who defies the validity of the acceptable evidence may be forced to pay a video expert of video to conduct a test and verification test.

Nearly 50 % of the voters said that Deepfakes had some influence on the election decision: survey

Deepfakes pose a serious risk to the judicial system, according to Family Law lawyer Michel O’Neill. (Getty Images / Getty Images)

The fraudulent evidence can extend to videos indicating the abuse of a child when two parties fight for custody. If the party does not have the financial means to refute the evidence of the abuse that has been created, the judges now must decide whether they will take the alleged victim’s word or believe that the footage that entered the court.

“What happens to people who do not have money [to disprove that]? Therefore, we not only have a threat to the safety of the judicial system, but we also have a problem in reaching justice, “O’Neill said.

Family Law lawyer indicated that judges are primarily seeing the use of heinous artificial intelligence to create counterfeit documents, such as fake banking records or drug tests.

One of the judges O’Neil also told that they encountered a psalm audio tape that threw the other side in a negative light. The quality of the registration was not reasonable enough. The individual judge reprimanded and the evidence was excluded.

Get Fox Business on the Go by clicking here

However, with the rapid increase in this technology, O’Neil worries that the gap between what is real and what is created from artificial intelligence will narrow.

“I think it is a problem on many levels of our society. You know, drawing attention to this is very important,” she said.