If AI Is Doing Such Amazing Work, Everyone Should Get a Four-Day Workweek

In 2025, we were constantly told, artificial intelligence revolutionized the workplace. Counts of billionaires with wax around the “upcoming recession” and “unemployment crisis” that it will certainly bring.

Bernie Sanders, progressive senator from Vermont, was listening.

Calling on the American technology industry on self-noise-which often includes generating value to shareholders-Sanders recently asked a rhetorical question about the Podcast Joe Rogan: If artificial intelligence is strong as they say, then why not give workers a week for 30 hours?

“Technology will improve us, and not only people who have technology and executives of large companies,” Sanders said. “You are a worker, your productivity is increasing because we offer you Amnesty International, right? Instead of throwing you on the street, I will reduce your business week to 32 hours.”

“This means, it gives you more time with your family, with your friends, for education, whatever hell you want to do,” suggested Senator. “You don’t have to work 40 hours a week anymore.”

Although the 30 -hour work week may seem unpopular, it is important to remember that the week of 40 hours is less than a century, as it became only a federal law in 1940. One can look at this legislation as a privilege for industrial workers in 1933, which was a 30 -hour warning in the week that most of us can imagine in 2025.

Even Bernie agrees. “There are companies around the world that do so with some success.”

However, the truth is that artificial intelligence is far from ready for optimistic work repairs such as the 30 -day Sanders Week, or even the idea of ​​the OPNAI company full of guilt for comprehensive basic income.

Despite the widespread fear of the demobilization of workers who are fueled by artificial intelligence and the labor market in a state of chaos, the main functionality of Amnesty International currently gives companies coverage because they use high -wage jobs for low wage workers. Over time, more company executives realize that artificial intelligence – animal vehicles, is ineffective, and vulnerable to hallucinations – not suitable for humans.

However, even in the Tobi world where Amnesty International can accurately carry out tasks, the idea of ​​Sanders has some defects.

The most prominent is the issue of unequal exchange between rich and poor countries. Given the growing tendency in the technology industry to empty arduous tasks such as the classification of artificial intelligence for low wage workers in countries such as Kenya, it is possible that the work week that works from artificial intelligence for 30 hours in the United States is likely to increase the inequality of other parts of the world.

We already see signs of this: A digital labor study 2024 found that the artificial intelligence industry helps the rich countries to maintain the dependency of poor countries on exploiter trade, at the expense of their workers. In poor countries, artificial intelligence also leads to new types of economic turmoil, as what is already existed.

Inside the United States, the concept of 30 hours also depends on the good intention of companies aimed at profit, something they have never given workers about the kindness of their hearts.

To date, with defective artificial intelligence today, workers in the United States states that technology reduces their productivity and fixes it with more work daily – no less. Meanwhile, studies have shown that huge artificial intelligence investments “had no significant effect on profits or hours registered in any occupation.”

Regardless of these issues, the Sanders’ proposal reduces an exciting fact: that a world work week for 30 hours is possible, due to the world’s workers to win for ourselves.

More about labor: The highest project capitalist says, he says artificial intelligence