Star Wars’ Showcase of AI Special Effects Was a Complete Disaster

If the Disney leadership is its way, we will all deal with the endless and continuous stars war and turn until the sun explodes. What is the best way to maintain the tan of the device descending from the use of good artificial intelligence?

Unfortunately, he explained 404 mediaWe just got a preview of what it might seem. The Industrial Light and Magic Studio, the legendary visual influence studio behind almost every “Star Wars” movie, has released a new show that shows how AI can have superior fees for the science of science fiction.

What is surprising, it seems very terrible.

The explanatory show, called “Star Wars: Field Guide” In Ted’s latest speech It was presented by Rob Bredo, the ILM chief official, who confirmed that it was just a test – “not a final product” – was created by one artist within two weeks.

Bredo said that you are supposed to give you a feeling of what he will be to send a probe to the Star War planet. But what is revealed does not feel like a “stars war” at all. More importantly, it is just a collection of documentary shots of a self -appearance nature, which features the designs of the most mysterious creature that I have ever seen. All of them can be recognized immediately as a form of realistic earth animals, which reflects AI’s Obstetric’s criticism as just a tool of renewing existing art.

You can see it here Yourself, but here is a quick group of metaphysics offered-which all contain fake artificial intelligence. Blue tiger with the lion’s builder. A sheep from the exit owned by what is clearly it is just claws. Monkey with lines. Point bear with lines. This peacock is actually snail. Blue Ayes with random brown ears. Spider monkey. Brutal donkey. You need to say more?

“None of these creatures seems to belong to the Star Wars,” one of the commentators wrote on TED Talk. “Obviously, they are two ground animals that fuse together with the most basic ways.”

Do not make mistakes: ILM is a pioneer in making special effects. Founded by George Lucas during the production of the original movie “Star Wars”, Innovative Many of the optical deception exploits on which movie makers depend today while driving CGI. Its valids range from “Terminator 2” and “Jurassic Park” to “Star Soldiers”.

This is why it is more frustrated to see it exists into a technique that manipulates an ideal artistic shape. What ILM shows to us is far from the designs of the iconic creature that the “Star War” is famous, from TAUNTAUNS to Ewoks.

Certainly there is room for discussion on the extent of the role that artificial intelligence should play in filmmaking-with the fact that the Labor Party is the biggest question-and the Bredow pronounces the topic by indicating that ILM has always taken advanced techniques and used it with installed techniques. He assures the audience that real artists do not go anywhere, and that “innovation flourishes when old and new techniques are mixed together.”

This is good and good. But to jump from this kind of exact position to show the creations that have been completely created from artificial intelligence, it sends a very conflicting message.

More on artificial intelligence in movies: Disney says its “Fantastic Four” is not Amnesty International, as it actually looks like an absolute garbage