Judge denies DHS request to reconsider Guatemalan deportee return order

A federal judge refused a request from the Ministry of Internal Security (DHS) to reconsider

The decision of the American boycott court, Brian Murphy, in Massachusetts, comes after he issued a ruling last week saying that the removal of the individual – which was determined only in the name of OCG – “lacks legal procedures.”

Murphy wrote on Friday: “In general, this issue does not provide any special facts or legal circumstances, only the prominent horror of a man who is incorrectly loaded on a bus and sent to a country where it was raped and kidnapped.”

“The defendants are required to take all urgent steps, including coordination with the prosecutor’s lawyer, to facilitate OCG’s return to the United States,” he added.

The American judge accuses Trump’s official “chaos of manufacturing” in the deportation of South Sudan, and the escalation of the dispute

In the deposit, Murphy described Ocg as a citizen and a citizen in Guatemala the first in the United States “without appropriate permission” in March 2024.

“OCG claims that he presented himself to resort to the border and was deprived of an interview. In any case, he was shortly deported to Guatemala. In April 2024, Ocg decided to try again and via Mexico on his way to the United States.

Read the judge’s order – App users, click here:

“In May 2024, OCG arrived again to the United States and was arrested by the borders of the border. However, he was referred to the asylum officer after expressing the fear of returning to Guatemala. This officer decided that OCG had a reliable fear of persecution or that this was overlooked if this was not reported if this was not reported if this was not reported if the procedures are not reported. Guatemala.

“Two days after the removal blocking, without any advanced warning, OCG was placed on a bus and sent to Mexico. According to OCG, the officers begged him to allow him to call his lawyer but he was rejected.”

NY AG, 19 others who lawsuits against Trump official, claiming federal funds associated with immigration enforcement

In the May 6. (Reuters/Kevin Lamark)

“In Mexico, OCG has been given the option to detention indefinitely while trying to get asylum there – a country where he constantly emphasized that he is facing a great danger of violence – or to return to Guatemala – the country from which the immigration judge remains on it today. Presentation.

“Only yesterday, OCG made an advertisement that informs the court for its current situation. It mentions a constant fear of his attackers, and he was unable to leave the place where he resides, the inability to rely on the police to protect him, and the inability to see his mother to fear that she is subjected to violence, from other difficulties.”

In response to a decision, the Ministry of National Security said that “the asylum system in America was not intended to use the actual pardon program or a card -free card.

“The person concerned was illegally present, who was granted to withholding the removal to Guatemala. He was instead to Mexico, a third safe option for him, pending his demand for his claim.

“The Trump administration is committed to re -resorting system to its original intention.”

Maryland is an actor who returned from El Salvador after she failed to meet Kilmar Abrago Garcia

A federal judge issued a court order calling for “taking all instant steps” to return the Guatemali reference to the United States (Bill Bogliano)

The matter came from Murphy to the re -OCG in response to the lawsuit of the collective lawsuit filed on his behalf and three other prosecutors, who were determined as immigrants from Cuba, Ecuador and Honduras who are residents of Massachusetts and Texas.

“The proposed prosecutors and members of the suggested are not sympathetic to the final removal orders resulting from the procedures that were notified that they can be deported to a specific country of removal (their country is usually their country of origin), and in some cases, there is an alternative state of removal (usually a citizenship state or have a place).

“They bring this collective measure to challenge the policy or practice of the Ministry of Internal Security to deport, or seek deportation, to them to a third country – a country that has never been devoted to removal – without providing them first by notifying or the opportunity for the practitioner to remove on the basis that they have fear of persecution, torture, and even death if they are deported to this third country,” she added the complaint.

He also said: “The DHS policy or practices of intolerance of the costs of this basic protection violate the Immigration and Nationality law, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Law of 1998, and the condition of due procedures in the fifth amendment, and the treaties of the treaty in the United States.”

Click here to get the Fox News app

Lawyers who represent the four prosecutors immediately did not respond on Wednesday for the comment requests from Fox News Digital.