Justin Baldoni Calls Ryan Reynolds Blake Lively’s ‘Co-Conspirator’

Justin Balouni His legal team argues that Ryan ReynoldsThe suggestion of the separation must be rejected.

According to the court documents you obtained US weekly On Thursday, April 3, a lawyer has argued that Reynolds, 48, “pretends that the first amended complaint in the amended parties (” Fac “) fails to set any basis of his responsibility and that he was acting as a supportive wife only.”

The deposit continued: “FAC allegedly claims abundant facts to support the demands of the parties to Wayfarer against him, based on both direct actions and responsibility as a co -consume.”

Balmone lawyers also stated that if Reynolds request is accepted to dismiss, dead pool The star should not be able to restore the lawyer.

A spokesman for Reynolds addressed the latest deposit in a statement to we.

“The main fast food from opposing the road parties to Ryan’s proposal to reject their case is that they finally realize the simple defects in their complaint.” “They claim again to defame without claiming who has been defied, or what was said specifically, or how anyone suffered from actual damage.”

The statement continued: “Unlike Mr. Baldouni, who built his brand that pretended to be a” confident man “to listen to” women in his life, Ryan Reynolds is in fact that man and will continue to support his wife because she stands with individuals is not limited to this, but they have never failed in California. Wayfarer concerts cover the costs of Ryan and lawyers to bring such The trivial issue in the first place.

Bloolic lawyer Bian Friedman He also took the deposit in a statement issued to US weekly Thursday, April 3.

The statement stated: “Mrs. Livly and her circle from the Hollywood elite can prevent my customers from exercising their constitutional right to seek the court to wipe their names from her wrong and harmful claims.” “What Ms. Livly is trying to do is a serious precedent by preventing the court doors to my customers and punishing them to spend their day in the court, and it is a protected right by the first amendment. This right protects not only the master of the blogging and continuing this matter, and they have it, and they continue to fight, and we will continue to do so.

Balmouni, 41, and Blake BlakeLegal drama began in December 2024. In a legal complaint, accused by Lively, 37 End with us Costar and the director of sexual harassment and claims to organize a campaign to distort it.

Balmouni denied these allegations and then filed a $ 400 million lawsuit against Livly, Reynolds and the actress propaganda. Both presented Lively and Reynolds paper works to reject the lawsuit while requesting advertising to remove it from the lawsuit.

In depositing the dismissal of Reynolds, the actor’s lawyer has argued that a case of inferiority “does not specify a defamation statement claiming to be made by Reynolds.

“It seems that the issue of Mr. Baldouni is based on Mr. Reynolds, claiming that the Mr. Palm” is “predatory”, but this is the problem, and this is not a defamation that they could not show that Mr. Reynolds did not believe that this statement is true. Mike Gottlieb and Asra Hudson to we. “The complaint does not claim that, on the contrary, the allegations in the complaint indicate that Mr. Reynolds really believes that Mr. Baldoni is a predator.”

The statement continued: “The wife of Mr. Reynolds accused Mr. Balouni – separately and in multiple complaints – of sexual harassment and revenge, and as Mr. Reynolds referred to, Mr. Reynold has also talked about his opinion in his opinion of what should be there to be anything for him in mind.