Lawmakers are skeptical of Zuckerberg’s commitment to free speech

The most recent amounts for the amounts of violations, Sarah Win Williams, a warm reception in the Capitol Hill on Wednesday, like Neglected people The author who fought the company for silence described the company’s CEO as a person ready to photograph anything that makes him closer to power.

The message in which the legislators were in the Judicial Sub -Committee on the Senate on crime and combating terrorism were very open. Their responses confirm that in the midst of the last axis of the CEO of Mark Zuckerberg in rest until the right, his conception in Washington has not changed completely, even when he is said to be pressuring President Donald Trump to drop the issue of anti -monopoly of the government against the company.

“He recently tried re-innovation, as he is now a great defender of freedom of expression, after he was a defender of censorship in China and in this country for years,” said Josh Holie (R-MO), Chairman of the Sub-Committee. “Now everything has been eliminated. Now he is on Joe Rogan and says he is Mr. Free Bells, he is Mr. Maga, he is a completely new man, and his company is a full new company. Do you buy this re -moved away to Mark Zuckerberg?”

“If he is a fan of freedom of expression, then why do you try to silence me?” Wayne Williams asked in response to this. She persuaded the arbitrary dead to order her to stop making extraction data and stopping more publishing and promoting the book, which explains the alleged dead dealings with the Chinese government and the demands of sexual harassment from a senior executive official. Andy Stone, a spokesman for the definition Neglected people “Aphary”, but the book publisher said he “will continue his support and promotion.”

Wayne Williams Holie also told Zuckerberg, “a man wearing many different costumes. When I was there, he wanted the president of China to mention his first child, and he was learning the mandarin, and he was under control of the content of his heart now.

At the hearing, Wynn-Williams witnessed that during the period of its presence in the company between 2011 and 2017, Meta and Zuckerberg were ready to “undermine US national security” in the service of Carrie with the Chinese government. Meta was accused of working on the “control tools” that the Chinese government can use to silence critics and provide US -Chinese user data to the Communist Party.

In a statement, Meta Ryan Daniels spokesman for Wynn-Williams called “divorced from reality and is full of wrong demands. While Mark Zuckerberg was publicly about our interest in providing our services in China and details have been reported widely more than a decade, and the fact is that this is: we are not working in our services in China today.”

Senator Amy Klopuwshar (D-Mn) said that she found that it was “paradoxes” that China was a focus in the session, given that when I tried to pass a bill to combat technological monopoly, “One of the things that continued in my face in my face and in the face of others who work in this matter is that” you will actually destroy us and then China dominates China. ” To put growth on the American national interest to gain preference with the Communist Party of China. ”

Launders dared Zuckerberg to testify in front of their committee himself to clarify their issues with their statements. “He stopped trying to silence her, stop trying to heal her, and stop trying to hide behind your lawyer and millions of dollars in the legal fees you are trying to impose on,” said Holie. “Come to this committee, spit the right, sit there, let us wonder about you, and give the American people the truth. We will wait for you.”

Wynn-Williams told the sub-committee its testimony, “It might be the last time I allowed to speak,” given the legal restrictions. “It will not be the last time to speak if we have anything to do with it,” said Senator Richard Blumental. “What I would like to say to Mark Zuckerberg, stop adapting Mrs. Wayne Williams, let her talk about the truth, come here and tell us that you copy the truth, if you have the courage to do so.”