GOP senator calls regime change long-term solution for Iran-Israel peace

First on the fox: The Senate Republic believes that changing the regime is the best “long -term” solution in Iran with a fragile ceasefire between the Islamic Republic and Israel continues to keep it.

The truce between Israel and Iran came late last month, and until now it was placed in the fighting that took place for 12 days in the region, which began when the Jewish state struck Iranian targets on June 13. It was crowned with an American strike on Iranian nuclear sites with the stands of the stands in a superpower by president Donald Trump.

senator Steve Denz, R. Mont, who works for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said he was previously the head of the Senate Campaign in the Senate, and said he was optimistic that the truce would keep it, but he warned that Iran’s deep aggression towards Israel could be the disposal of stopping-what was not a new system.

The Senate closes Kane’s attempt to verify Trump’s powers of war

“I see the longest -term solution in Iran will be the change of the regime,” said Denz. “Because until you have a system that recognizes the legitimacy of the Jewish State of Israel and their right to exist, and believes that Israel should not be destroyed, I do not think that we will bring the peace we need, and we all aspire to see it between Iran and Israel and frankly in the Middle East.”

Denz’s feelings come before an expected meeting between Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday at the White House.

The mission has been completed: Republicans in the Senate are retreating from a leaked report on Iran’s strikes

President Donald Trump joined Israeli Minister of Strategic Affairs Ron Dimer, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and Vice President J. (Jabin Botsford /The Washington Post via Getty Images)

There is a batch of two parties between actors Mike Luller, RN.Y, Josh Goetheimir, DN.J, to increase Israel’s armament with B-2 bombers and bombs that penetrate the warehouse, but most legislators, including Daines, do not believe that the United States should participate in raising the current system and installing one new.

The United States participated in changing the regime in the country in the fifties of the last century, when the then Minister of Leadership Muhammad Moussadig and opened the door to Shah Muhammad Reza Bahlvi to control Iran. In 1979, the Islamic Revolution, which removed Bahlvi from power and witnessed the birth of the current regime.

Denz argued that any change should come from the inside, because “otherwise, it is a matter of time before this system loses its legitimacy.”

“Change the system is risky because you may end up with something worse than you have,” Denz said. “Now in this case, the tape is set in Iran very low, but you can get an equivalent type of philosophy, or perhaps something a little better.”

“Not our role”: legislators are cautious about peace in the Middle East, and they are not ready to change the system

On June 21, the United States struck Iranian nuclear sites in Fordow, Natanz and ISFAHAN. President Donald Trump said that the operation left Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities. (Fox News)

“I think we need to have a system that realizes that Iran and its prosperity in the long run will be linked to agriculture near the West and being an ally of the West and not an ally of China, Russia, North Korea.”

Click here to get the Fox News app

“The ceasefire is not the end. This is what the ceasefire is.” “It will be permanent peace when the Iranian leadership will realize the legitimacy of Israel as a Jewish state.”

“Until this happens, I think Iran will remain a threat, especially if the system, whether the current system or a system has changed a similar ideology as the current system, Israel must be destroyed.” “This is not a peaceful result. This is just delaying what might be the future development of nuclear capabilities and a kind of first strike by Iran, either against Israel or against the United States.”