Is AI Better Than Us? A Personal Look at AI’s Industrial Revolution and What We Might Be Missing

Everywhere we move to, someone talks about artificial intelligence. It is in our phones, our cars, our homes – but some of their biggest moves talk out of view, deep interior factories, power plants, oil excavators, charging arenas, and data centers that calmly run the spine in the world.

I spent years to watch this reveal, and I still ask myself the same questions: Will artificial intelligence be really better than us? Are we ready for what this means when the machines do not help us at work – but we are quietly outperformed in the same tasks that we have built entire economies and societies?

Smart machines on the factory floor

Today’s factories do not look like black and white pictures of the industrial age. Instead of crowded rows of workers who dare with hand by hand, you will find clean and efficient production lines as automatic weapons move with perfect synchronization. Computer vision cameras examine each product, with discovering invisible defects per millimeter. Self -powered software regulates the flow of parts and materials accurately that no human manager can match his own.

The benefits are undeniable. Artificial intelligence helps factories to reduce scrap, low energy consumption, and improve safety in the workplace by taking over serious tasks. In some sectors – such as space manufacturing or semiconductors – the role of artificial intelligence is the difference between staying on doors or closing doors worldwide.

But every time the technology rises, the human role turns. Sometimes it completely disappears.

Prediction maintenance: When machines tell us what they need

One of the most prominent industrial applications of artificial intelligence is predictive maintenance. Traditionally, companies waited either to break something – the risk of catastrophic stoppage time – or hold the solid maintenance tables that waste time and resources.

Now, with Internet of Things sensors that feed GB of data in automated learning algorithms, companies can predict failure a few days or weeks ago. This is a victory of efficiency – the turbines that cost millions of emergency closure can continue to rotate for a longer, safer and clean period.

But there is the side of the face. Skilled technicians who used to diagnose problems are replaced by listening to the engine on the engine with information and algorithms. What happens to that literal knowledge – that human instinct that was built for decades? Is it fading, or is it developing into a new kind of experience? Often, no one has a clear answer.

Supply Series: An invisible artificial intelligence hand

Behind the factory walls, artificial intelligence transforms how raw materials move around the world. Artificial intelligence tools expect that the demand for nails and turmoil will increase weeks ago, which helps companies control the shipping methods and stocks. Vehicles and independent aircraft are drone by making the last tilt connection faster, cheaper and less dependent on human drivers.

During the epidemic, the fragility of nude global supply chains was placed. Many companies that have already had expectations from AI have survived better chaos than those that did not. So yes – Amnesty International can make the system more flexible. But with the automation of more links in the chain, we rely on fewer human hands. At what point we risk losing local jobs and small companies that have kept these systems balanced and adaptable?

Lost conversation

There is a worrying thing about how to discuss these shifts as a show. Preparing the Board of Directors and Technical Conferences with excitement on saving costs and efficiency gains. But outside those walls, people ask whether there is still a place for them in this new economy.

I call it Missing conversation Lack of domain awareness about what is happening to real people when artificial intelligence enters to improve the entire industries. It is not just a matter about new jobs that replace old jobs – it relates to whether our institutions, education systems and leaders are moving quickly to help people achieve this jump. Now, they are not.

Will Amnesty International be better than us – or only different?

Sometimes we ask, Will Amnesty International be better than humans? But perhaps this is the wrong question. Artificial intelligence will not be better In the way we think – it will be so various. Do not get tired, bored, or union. Steps will not exceed negligence or protest without safe conditions. It finds patterns in data oceans that no single brain can bear. But he also does not understand why any of this is important.

It will not protest when a decision moved by the algorithm is closed as a factory that supports thousands of families. It will not be sad for the loss of skilled trade across generations. He will not notice the gap that left behind when people lose the work that gave them the purpose.

This has to note – and do something about it.

A turning point – if we want that

There is no doubt that artificial intelligence can help solve tremendous problems. It can reduce carbon emissions in heavy industry. It can enhance productivity so that companies remain competitive against low -wage countries. Workers can help avoid dangerous tasks that caused countless injuries and deaths.

But these gains only add real progress if we bear the responsibility of the parts that we cannot see: people and societies and what the work means in a world managed by smart machines.

We need leaders – in business, government and technology – who are interested in more than just profit margins and quarterly profits. We need a large -scale delivery plan and build new paths for purpose and prosperity. We need to penetrate the blind optimism that “the market will secure it”.

Because he will not. Not what we did not make.

My last idea

I am not afraid of artificial intelligence itself. I fear what happens when we give it the keys to our most vital industries without stopping the question: Do we use this tool to serve people – or to replace them quietly? Progress is not automatic. Wisdom is not integrated into the code. This part is still up to us.

So before we celebrate the next jump in artificial artificial intelligence, let’s take a breath and expand the conversation. Let’s ask the most difficult questions about what kind of future that we build – and who will participate in it.

If we get this right, artificial intelligence will not be “better than us.” Perhaps this will simply help us to be the best version of ourselves – more innovative, more flexible and more humane.

This is a future worth building.

You may enjoy listening to AI World Deep Dive Podcast: