Medicare Will Start Paying AI Companies a Share of Any Claims They Automatically Reject

The private health insurance companies have long required “previously permission” before you can get the treatment you need. Often, they will try to deny the largest possible number of these claims – including With the use of artificial intelligence models.

However, government -backed plans such as Medicare tend to cover private insurance companies that are not doing, and without the arduous application process.

But it could be about to change. Medicare and Medicaid Services centers said that it will test their own version of prior permission using artificial intelligence models to examine claims, as part of its new program called the belt called the waste and inappropriate service model, or more wisdom.

And get this: like New York Times Reports, artificial intelligence companies will get this experience a share of money that they have provided by preventing people from their health care. These savings may seem like billions of dollars over the next six years – and this is if the program is not expanded.

This is mainly the artificial intelligence companies as a “new new fisherman,” said David A. Lipshotz, co -director of the Medical Care Defense Center, Newton. In other words, it is clear that it stimulates the refusal of claims above all.

Currently, the program, which begins in January, will be limited to six states: New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona, and Washington. Officials confirm that artificial intelligence tools will only be used to judge the claims for about ten different types of procedures that they consider a waste and do not provide a small benefit, including steroid snapshots to relieve pain, according to Newton. Moreover, models will not be used to review emergency and residence services in hospitals, said the director of the Medical Care and Medicines Center.

Experts are not convinced that he will remain this way for a long time. “You somewhat left to ask, well, where does this lead after that?” “Ohio’s surgeon and an expert in the policy of pushing medical care Newton. “It can go on a slippery slope.”

Officials also confirm that the final decision on denial-or in the language of industry, “unconfirmed”-will be done through an appropriate “human physician licensed, not a machine”, and Soton said that there will be penalties for the wrong rejection.

However, the behavior of private insurance companies indicates that keeping humans in the episode is not a protection against abusive abuse. 2023 ProPublica investigation I found that CIGNA used an algorithm to examine and deny claims automatically, which was approved by human doctors who did not look at patients’ records. United Healthcare He claims that he used the Amnesty International algorithm It is called “NH NH” to reject claims as well, although it was an error rate of more than 90 percent.

Until the disbursement of any potential evil intentions, is there evidence that artificial intelligence models will be good in being objective arbitrators for those who see the doctor and not? as Newton He explains that these systems usually look at the patient’s history to see if they meet the insurance company standards, such as physical therapy experience first before retracting surgery.

but Modern research It has shown how artificial intelligence systems can inform patients by accidentally not seeking medical care because of an unimportant and random thing like one typographical error in a document. The work has even found that the models showed an anxious sexual bias, and tells women not to see the doctor more than men.

Do not worry, though. We will be sure of all this will be settled because artificial intelligence models are enabled prematurely to determine whether or not you get health care, while their owners get their salaries based on the number of people who refuse.

More about artificial intelligence: The TV program host, who is now responsible for Medicare, wants to replace doctors with AI