M&S hack attack will have tech firms ringing up the profits

Digest opened free editor

Rola Khaleda, FT editor, chooses her favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.

Electronic attacks take longer to repair, and more than just distraction, more than the heads of the injured companies tend to think in the beginning. This is what CEO of CEO Stewart Machin from Marx and Spencer now told four weeks in an attack that will cost 300 million pounds or about 30 percent of operating profits last year.

What is bad for penetration victims is useful for technology providers, as it encourages spending on cybersecurity. More than four out of 10 actions have reported violations or security attacks in the past 12 months, according to surveying cybersecurity violations of the UK government. While retailers top the headlines of the Hharuds and the supermarkets, the cooperative-the exposure of other industries.

Technology is so part of the cleaning cost. For example, the M&S speeds its digital and technical plans. The UK’s retail seller has already doubled the spending of cybersecurity since 2021. At the global level, investment in anti -friction programs increases by a moderate teenage percentage every year, and TD COWEN estimates, and will reach $ 300 billion by 2028. This has led to the rapid growth of security providers such as Palo Alto networks, whose revenues were in the last three months 15 percent.

Piracy develops, so executives must run to stand steadfast. Magistical programs, or software designed to cause damage, has decreased from 60 percent of the attacks to about 20 percent over the past five years, according to Croldstrike. But “Vishing” attacks – using phone calls to extract personal data – were clarified in the second half of last year. AI Toulidi is a threat, because of its ability to adapt quickly to new defenses, and a solution when it is trained to discover abnormal patterns.

Spending should go further when presidents and technicians agree on the biggest threats. Companies also build some knowledge of cybersecurity in their councils. Managers do not have to be experts, but they must be at least able to discuss the topic with specialists in a fruitful manner. But there is a large space between knowing what is harmful and thief programs, and understanding the effects of third -party contractors who have access to the company’s systems – the weakness that revealed M & S.

The pain of the retail dealer has not yet ended. It will not be possible to fully resume online sales for weeks-a big blow due to the three customers who shop online or in the store. And hit the reputation, too, not something inhale. It is not clear if the M&S is especially weak, or unlucky. Electronic attacks in general are both. But it must urge its ordeal to the heads of other companies to increase their defenses.

jennifer.hughes@ft.com