Why humanoid robots need their own safety rules

He says: “If the number will go out to a corridor in front of you, you do not want to be surprised.” The robot can use vocal orders, but the sound alone is not practical for high industrial preparation. It may be more confused if you have multiple robots in the same space – which one is trying to draw your attention?

There is also a psychological effect that distinguishes humans from other types of robots. Of course, we are spying robots that resemble us, which can lead us to estimate their capabilities and frustration if they do not rise to the level of those expectations. He says: “Sometimes you are your caution for safety, or your expectations about what this robot can do for reality up.” These problems are a special problem when robots aim to perform roles that involve emotional work or support for vulnerable people. The IEEE report recommends that any criteria for emotional safety assessments and policies include “relieving psychological tension or alienation”.

To inform the report, Greta Hilburn, a user -based designer at the American Acquisition University University, performed surveys with a wide range of non -engineers to learn their expectations about human robots. People wanted an overwhelming majority of robots that could form facial expressions, read the accurate expressions of people, and use gestures, sound and gifts to communicate. “They wanted everything – something that does not exist,” she says.

Escape from the warehouse

Obtaining an interaction between the right person may be extremely important if people want to get out of industrial spaces and in other contexts, such as hospitals, elderly care environments or homes. Helporne says it is especially important for robots that may work with the weak population. “The damage that can occur within an interaction with a robot if it is not programmed to speak in a way to make a person feel safe, whether he is a child or an adult older, can definitely have different types of results,” she says.

IEEE recommendations include enabling human transcendence, unifying some visual and auditory signals, and aligning the appearance of robot with its capabilities so as not to mislead users. If a human robot, says Barath, people expect that they will be able to have a conversation and show some emotional intelligence; If it can actually perform basic mechanical tasks only, this may cause confusion, frustration and loss of confidence.

“It is a type of self -examination.” “Nobody expects them to chat with you or help in grocery stores, because they are clear machines. But if they look like a friendly employee and then repeat only,” please scan your next element, “people will be upset.”

Prarather and Hilburn emphasize the need for inclusiveness and the ability to adapt when it comes to interaction between man. Can the robot communicate with deaf or blind? Will you be able to adapt while waiting for a little longer for people who may need more time to respond? Can you understand different accents?

There may also be some different criteria for robots that work in different environments. The robot that works in a factory alongside the people who were trained to interact with it is one thing, but the robot designed to help at home or interact with children in a recreational garden is another suggestion. With some general basic rules, the audience must eventually be able to understand what the robots do wherever they face. It says it is not related to being a blemish or restraining innovation, but about identifying some basic guidelines so that the manufacturers, organizers and end users know all of what can be expected: “We only say that you should reach this minimum – and we all agree below for this bad.”

The IEEE report aims to invite to work for standards, such as the ISO group in Vicentini, to start the process of defining this tape. Vicentini says, he is still early for human robots. The standards help manufacturers to build confidence in their products and facilitate their sale in international markets, and organizers often depend on them when they come out with their own rules. Looking at the diversity of players in this field, it will be difficult to create a standard that everyone agrees, but “everyone is not very happy enough.”