AUKUS’s Survival Is a Good Sign for Trump’s Indo-Pacific Strategy – Foreign Policy

It seems that the Security Agreement of Countries that has been from the Kingdom and the Australian state, known as AUKUS Nikki Asia It was mentioned that he cited an official from a member of AUKUS. Unless nothing changes from now and October 20, when Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albaniz visits the White House – the possibility in the Trump world – Washington will continue to participate in Aukus as before.

Aukus is a major element in the Indian and Pacific strategy that the Trump administration has inherited from its predecessor. It is important to defend Australia, that the agreement requires joint production of nuclear -powered submarines, and the sale of three Virginia-Sectarian submarines to Canberra by the early thirties of the last century (with two other people), as well as many other cooperative measures, such as American forces’ courses in Australian bases and cooperation in high -end missiles and other weapons technologies that will enhance deterrence against China.

It seems that the Security Agreement of Countries that has been from the Kingdom and the Australian state, known as AUKUS Nikki Asia It was mentioned that he cited an official from a member of AUKUS. Unless nothing changes from now and October 20, when Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albaniz visits the White House – the possibility in the Trump world – Washington will continue to participate in Aukus as before.

Aukus is a major element in the Indian and Pacific strategy that the Trump administration has inherited from its predecessor. It is important to defend Australia, that the agreement requires joint production of nuclear -powered submarines, and the sale of three Virginia-Sectarian submarines to Canberra by the early thirties of the last century (with two other people), as well as many other cooperative measures, such as American forces’ courses in Australian bases and cooperation in high -end missiles and other weapons technologies that will enhance deterrence against China.

Certainly, it was not a relevant conclusion that Aukus would survive the increasing scrutiny. US President Donald Trump was tired of many allies and traditional partners in Washington, interrogating old US security obligations, and criticized in friendly countries with a harsh tariff. It made it a point opposite to many Biden era programs, if not most of them, and thus showed AUKUS-from the Baden Biden Coordinator, Court Campbell, to be on the cutting block as well. In fact, the sources of administration are early doubt about some of the provisions of the agreement. In addition, the Ministry of Governmental efficiency managed by Elon Musk Technical billionaire was implementing measures to reduce costs throughout the United States government, and sometimes, this included reducing or eliminating defense programs.

Trump no. 3 In the Pentagon, the Undersecretary of the Ministry of Defense for policy, Elberbridge Colby, led this summer, apparently to ensure AUKUS alignment properly with the so -called foreign policy of America.

Another cause of concern is that the Emerging foreign policy of the Trump administration seems to have slightly reduces the importance of launching the great power competition against China in the Indian Pacific Ocean. Instead, the priority in defending Western football and American internal security will be, according to the upcoming national defense strategy, which Kulby also directed. In addition, Trump has indicated several times that he wanted to conclude a “deal” with Chinese leader Xi Jinping – with some White House procedures that this could come at the Taiwan account. These were all good reasons to believe that the Trump team might abandon Okos.

But the durability of AUKUS through departments suggests, for example, that the American deterrence against China is still a strategic priority, and secondly, that recruiting Australian support towards this goal adds value. Although Canberra did not connect AUKUS directly to the war against China, and has never pledged to use AUKUS assets for this purpose, Australia has nevertheless highlighted AUKUS in a crisis or war placing. Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles noticed, for example, in 2023: “All our trade is for Japan, all of our trade to South Korea … pass through the South China Sea … The maintenance of the rules-based system, as we understand it-Narwina from navigation, and freedom of enlightenment-in full in the interests of Australia. … For this reason we have to follow the path we are.”

The result of Colby’s review maintains many important geological effects. One of them is that, despite the political currents on the contrary – especially between the Maga militants in Trump, which complains of the endless participation of the United States in “globalization” and generally wants to see the US military to do less around the world to redirect resources to the homeland, TROMP actually indicates continuity rather than the interruption of previous policy. Indeed, since the chairmanship of George W. Bush, Washington has generally gave competition with Beijing through the STATECRAFT spectrum, and Trump was during his first term that intensified this competition. In 2021, Aukus became part of the military component of these efforts.

The preservation of Aukus also helps to clarify Trump’s policy in China as he is preparing to meet Xi on the sidelines of the summit of economic cooperation in the Asia Pacific region in South Korea later this month. Unlike his first term, when he was constantly strong and rewarding, Trump has sent conflicting messages since she returned to the White House, making it unclear whether he wants to engage or confront China. Trump, for example, said he wanted to meet Shi in Beijing, perhaps in order to reset the bilateral relationship. A recent report indicates that the price of Trump’s XI reset is a clear confirmation that Washington was “opposing” the independence of Taiwan. But it is still unclear what Beijing wants to present, and Trump may be willing to accept the deal that Trump is seeking to strike.

The uncertainty about the US policy was especially worrying for Taiwan. Perhaps to send positive signals to XI, the Trump administration has deprived the Taiwanese President Lay Cheng T through the United States for a planned visit to Latin America during the summer. According to Trump, Trump provided 400 million dollars of military aid to Taiwan. However, at the same time, his administration is planning to the largest weapons package ever to Taiwan, exceeding $ 18.3 billion in Trump’s first term. Regardless, the survival of long -term obligations under Aukus gives more confidence to those who believe that Trump wants to remain harsh in China, rather than only to appear as difficult to get a better deal on trade or any other things at a later time.

It is clear that Trump’s decision to keep Oukos is good for Australia. After an investment of about one billion dollars in the program (and planning to spend up to $ 240 billion over the next three decades), Canberra has a large share of AUKUS success. Albaniz said the agreement will provide “the largest individual leap in our defensive ability in our history.” Meanwhile, the Australians have already started training how to build, maintain and operate AUKUS submarines. Simply put, Canberra cannot bear the AUKUS failure.

Trump’s acceptance of Okos also has a long way to raise the allies of the United States and other partners at the Washington Summit in the Power in the Indian Pacific Ocean. Japan, India, New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam and others will take note of Washington’s decision to remain involved instead of drifting away from the region with the high strength and impact of China. In fact, maintaining AUKUS meters in a barrage of bad news on how the Trump administration is dealing with the treatment of allies and partners. It also helps to deny any remaining doubts about the future of the American forces in the region, such as previous rumors – which the administration denied – that the United States may withdraw 4,500 soldiers from South Korea.

Moreover, if the Trump administration had canceled AUKUS, the planned follow-up of the agreement-the so-called AUKUS II-was in trouble as well. Brain II seeks to include other friendly states – including Canada, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea – in cooperative efforts in high -level military -related technology, such as at sea capabilities, quantum science, artificial intelligence, electronic technology, high -end technology, and electronic warfare. Additional efforts involve industrial basic cooperation, information participation, inter -employment, and other areas of close cooperation.

In the end, the Trump administration’s move to retain AUKUS is strategically correct, even if the pressure from the right -right Maga creates some political risks. The fact is that Aukus not only enhances American efforts to deter China but also supports a major American security ally, Australia. It sends the correct message to the Washington Network wider than allies and partners: Despite the local political turmoil and isolation and isolation, the United States is still planning to stay active in the most dynamic and important region in the world. For this, the Trump administration certainly deserves some credit.