Senate Republicans prepare to revise Trump’s megabill amid tight votes

Republicans in the House of Representatives achieved a victory in May with their progress in the “Grand and Beautiful Bill” of President Donald Trump, full of negotiations and one solutions on thorny policy issues that barely passed in the lower room.

Next week, Republicans in the Senate will play their analysis through the huge package, and change changes that may serve as a difficult sale to parliament spokesperson Mike Johnson, R. -La, who can only lose three votes.

Inside the drama late at night, which led to the passing of the Trump Tax Bill in one vote

Republicans in Congress in a dead race to get Megabel – full of Trump’s desires for taxes, immigration, energy, defense and national debt – at the President’s office by early July.

Trump threw his support behind the current product, but he said during a press conference at the Oval Office on Friday that he expected the package to be “wandering a little.”

“The Senate will be negotiated with the House of Representatives, but the final result is that it extends Trump tax discounts,” he said.

“If it is not approved, you will have a 68 % tax increase,” the president continued. “You’ll rise by 68 %. This is a number that no one has heard before. You will have a huge tax increase.”

The majority leader of the Senate, John Thun, has a corresponding margin for Johnson, and he will need to grow support from the Republican Senate, who wants to put its own fingerprints on the draft law.

Senators have indicated that they want to make changes to a set of parliament’s proposals, including reforms in Medicaid and the gradual schedule for the Green Energy Tax Glory, among other things, and grumbling around the height to the maximum local tax (Salt) that moderate Republicans paid.

Scoup: MEEME GOP MEMO highlights the Republican victory in the “Grand and Beautiful Bill of Trump”

The majority leader of the Senate speaks John Thun, RS. (Al Drao/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Thun said that many Republicans largely support the tax part of the draft law, which seeks to develop Trump’s first tax policy in the first term, especially the “catalyst” tax policies, which are pro -growth, and that will lead to an increase in the growth in the economy.

He said that a lot of discussion and a potential disk, from the upper room, are likely to focus on whether the width of the house has profound discounts in spending.

“When it comes next to spending from the equation, this is a unique moment in history and in history where we have the House of Representatives, the Senate and the White House and an opportunity to do something meaningful about government spending subject.”

The house package put a standard of $ 1.5 trillion in spending discounts over the next decade.

Some people in the Senate would like the Republican Party to see that the number has increased marginally to at least $ 2 trillion, because it is expected that the tax part of the package will add approximately 4 trillion dollars to the deficit, according to the recent results of the Joint Commission on Taxes.

“There are a lot of great things in this law,” Senator Roger Marshall, R. Kan, told Fox News Digital. “The only thing I would like to do is try to cut off the spending, and I would like to take a little from many places, instead of a lot of only one place.”

Johnson’s speaker clashes with Rand Paul for “WIMPY” spending discounts on the Trump invoice

Senator Ron Johnson, R. Wece. (CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Others want, like Senator Ron Johnson, R-Wis. , To see the cuts in the package to the levels of prenatal spending, which will reach about 6 trillion dollars in spending.

Johnson remained unusual in his opposition to the current draft law, and warned that “any degree of pressure” from Trump could change his opinion.

“President Trump made a set of promises,” Johnson said at an event in Wisconsin on Wednesday. “My promise was constantly, we have to stop mortgaging the future of our children. Well, so I think there is enough [Republicans] To slow down this process until the president, our leadership, becomes serious about returning to the prenatal level. “

Others are concerned about the proposed oblique of the spending of medical aid, which the Republic of Congress has made largely as a reform efforts aimed at removing waste, fraud and ill -treatment in the program used by millions of Americans.

Click here to get the Fox News app

The House of Representatives package will witness a discount of about $ 700 billion from the program, according to a report issued by the Non -Partisory Congress Budget Office (CBO), and some Republicans in the Senate indicated that they will not support changes if the benefits are reduced to their components.

Senator Josh Holie, R-MO, warned in an article published in the New York Times last month that cutting the advantages “was morally wrong and political suicide.” Meanwhile, Sanator Susan Collins, RR Men, has raised concerns about what the proposed discounts of the program will do for rural hospitals in her mandate.

“I cannot support the proposals that will create more coercion for our hospitals and service providers who are already swinging on the edge of insolvency,” she said.