America’s AI watchdog is losing its bite

Most Americans face the Federal Trade Committee only if they are deceived: it deals with theft of identity, fraud and stolen data. During the Biden administration, the agency went after artificial intelligence companies to extract them through deceptive advertising or hurting people by selling irresponsible techniques. With yesterday’s announcement of president Trump’s action of artificial intelligence, this era may now end.

In recent months of the Biden Administration under the leadership of President Lina Khan, the Federal Trade Committee imposed a series of prominent fines and procedures against artificial intelligence companies to correct technology and control the truth-or in some cases, made claims that were completely wrong.

She found that the security giant Evolv lied to the accuracy of the security checkpoints operating in Amnesty International, which are used in stadiums and schools but failed to capture a seven -inch knife that was eventually used to stab the student. After the Intellivision Company, he went on to say that the company has submitted baseless claims that its tools work without sex or racist bias. Promising startups have fined the “AI Lawyer” services and served the fake product reviews created with artificial intelligence.

These measures did not lead to fines that paralyze companies, but they prevented them from making wrong data and offered road customers to restore their money or get out of contracts. In each case, FTC found that ordinary people were harmed by artificial intelligence companies that allowed their techniques in operating Amok.

The plan issued by the Trump administration yesterday indicates that it believes that these measures were very far. In a section on the removal of “red tape and hard organization”, the White House says it will review all FTC measures taken under the Biden Administration “to ensure that the theories of responsibility not strengthened the burden of innovation from artificial intelligence.” In the same section, the White House says it will block federal funding related to AI from the “exhausting” states.

This step by the Trump administration is the latest in its advanced attack on the agency, which provides an important way to recover for people who have been harmed by Amnesty International in the United States. It is likely to lead to faster spreading of artificial intelligence with fewer checks about accuracy, fairness or harm to the consumer.

During the reign of Khan, one of the appointed Biden, FTC found fans in unexpected places. Progressive people called for the dismantling of monopolistic behavior in Big Tech, but some in the orbit of Trump, including Vice President JD Vance, also supported Khan in its battles against the technical elite, albeit to achieving the various goal of ending the supposed censorship of conservative speech.

But in January, with Khan and wearing at the White House, this dynamic collapsed. Trump issued an executive order in February and promised to “curb independent agencies such as FTC, which affects the wage without consulting the president. The following month, he began taking this pledge to the legal limits – and the past.

In March, the only Democratic Commissioners were shot at FTC. On July 17, a federal court ruled that one of the shooting operations, delegated Rebecca Siloter, was illegal given the agency’s independence, which brought the massacre to his position (the other commissioner launched by Al -Faro, Alvaro Bedoue, chose to resign instead of the battle of separation in the court, so his case was rejected). The slaughter is now the only democratic.

In naming FTC in its business plan, the White House now goes a step forward, and draws the agency’s behavior as a major obstacle to the United States in the “arms race” to develop Amnesty International better than China. It is not only promising to change the agency’s move, but to review the penalties for the agency and perhaps even cancel the penalties associated with AI in the past four years.

How can this play? Lea Fraser, who worked in FTC for 17 years before leaving it in May and worked as a Lakhn advisor, says it is useful to think about the agency’s actions against artificial intelligence companies as falling into two fields, each of which has different levels of support across political lines.

The first is about deception, as artificial intelligence companies mislead consumers. Consider the case of Evolv, or a recent case announced in April where FTC claims that a company called Workado, which provides a tool to discover if something has been written with artificial intelligence, does not have the evidence to support its claims. Fraser says that deception has the support of the two parties during its term.

“There are cases on the use of artificial intelligence, and they do not seem to have a lot of popular support,” added Fraser, who is now directing the digital justice initiative at the Civil Rights Committee under the law. These cases do not claim deception; Instead, they receive that companies have deployed artificial intelligence in a way that hurts people.

The most dangerous of this was announced, which led to the most important procedures related to the Acting FTC and examined by Frazier, in 2023. FTC prohibited Rite Rite Aid from using face intelligence recognition in its stores after it found technology that put an angles mark on science, especially women and people of colored, such as a shopper. “Work on wrong positive alerts,” FTC, Rite Aid, wrote consumers about their stores, their order, and their order to leave, [and] I called the police to confront or remove consumers. “

FTC found that Rite Aid failed to protect people from these errors, and did not monitor or test technology, and did not properly train employees on how to use them. The company was prevented from using facial recognition for five years.

This was a big deal. This procedure exceeded the verification of the deceptive promises made by the artificial intelligence companies to make the Rite Aid responsible for how to harm the technology of artificial intelligence consumers. These types of the AI-AI cases are those that Frazier disappears in the new FTC, especially if they include testing artificial intelligence models of bias.

“There will be fewer procedures, if any, on how to publish Amnesty International companies,” she says. The broader White House philosophy towards artificial intelligence, referred to in the plan, is the approach of “experience first” that tries to pay the adoption of AI faster everywhere than the Pentagon offices to the doctor’s offices. Fraser says that the lack of FTC enforcement, which is likely to result, is “dangerous for the public.”

Don’t miss more hot News like this! Click here to discover the latest in AI news!

2025-07-24 18:59:00