OPM Watchdog Says Review of DOGE Work Is Underway

The General Investigation Office of the Personnel Department Office confirmed that the independent office is investigating whether any “emerging threats” of sensitive information has arisen as a result of the operations of DJ in Elon Musk, which provides rapid changes on protected government networks.

“OPM Oig [office of the inspector general] In a letter dated March 7 to Democratic legislators, Norbert Vent, Norbert Vent, says, adding that his office is not only legally required to examine OPM security protocols, but it depends on “risk development”, adding that his office is not only legally required to examine OPM security protocols, but it depends on “risk development”, adding that his office is not only legally required to examine protocols OPM security, but it depends on “risk development”, adding that his office is not only legally required to examine OPM security protocols, but his office is not legally required to examine OPM security protocols, but it routinely relies on “risk development”. The letter stated that the office will contain specific requests issued by Democratic legislators last month in its “current work”, with a “new participation” on the potential risks of the agency related to computer systems that have been accessed or modified by the United States service.

Vent, which was launched by Trump, launched by his predecessor in January, is one of the deputies of the general inspectors who were urged by the Democrats in the House of Representatives Committee for government reform and reform last month to investigate reports of wireless and other outlets about Dog’s efforts to reach a wide range of registration systems that host some of the most sensitive data to the government, including the files of employees on government employees.

“We are very concerned that the arrival of the unauthorized system can occur throughout the federal government and can pose a major threat to the personal privacy of all Americans and to the national security of our nation,” wrote Gerald Honoli, the category of the Supervisory Committee in a letter on February 6.

In addition to OPM, Democrats pressed similar security assessments in five other agencies, including in the Treasury, Public Services Department, Small Business Administration, the American International Development Agency, and the Ministry of Education. However, VINT is the only international energy agency in any of the named agencies that have responded so far, a WIRED spokesman says.

While in the minority in the House of Representatives and the Senate, Democrats do not have a few power to conduct effective supervision outside the official listening sessions, which the Republicans must hold. During his first term, Trump’s Ministry of Justice issued instructions to notify the executive agencies that they are not permissible to answer questions from Democrats.

Republicans in Congress have adhered to the official supervision, if any, to the work of Dog, and instead chose the back channel with the billionaire on the effects of the anti -knights Crusader campaign.

The executive order was to establish Dog, who was signed by the president on his first day in his post, instructions to federal agencies to provide Musk customers with “full and advanced access” for all registry systems that are not classified in order to carry out a cleansing of the government “fraud, waste and abuse”. However, it soon became clear that Dog’s employees, many of whom are young engineers who had direct relationships with Musk’s private business, were very interesting to ensure the main privacy; Avoid, for example, mandatory assessments of new technologies installed on protected government networks.

“Many of the concerns that you have expressed in your message touch the problems that OPM Oig holds as part of our annual reviews of the IT and financial systems of OPM, and we plan to integrate these concerns in these current projects,” Vint writes in the March 7 letter. “We have just started a participation to assess the risks associated with new and modified information systems in OPM. We believe that in the end, our new participation will be widely treated many of your questions related to the integrity of OPM systems.”