Pentagon agrees to push transgender military ban deadline

The Trump administration’s ban is scheduled to enter the transgender persons who serve the army on Friday after the delay and the ongoing challenges in the court of the controversial Ministry of Defense (DOD).

The American boycott judge, headquartered in the capital, Anna Reyes, one of the appointed Biden, chaired a hearing on March 21, when the administration requested the delay of the original deadline on March 26 for the age of politics.

Reyes said she wanted to allow more time to appeal. She also said that she had previously allowed a lot of time to resume her previous opinion.

“I don’t want to tighten the constant current. This is my main concern here,” Reyes said during the March 21 session. “My room worked incredibly hard to get out of an opinion on time.”

A second judge sentenced to Trump to the transgender forces

Reyes gave the government the deadline for the three in the afternoon on the same day to return about its request to pay the deadline.

The government replied that it agreed to delay the deadline on March 26 to March 28.

The legal challenge comes at a time when the US Supreme Court is also considered a high -level issue that deals with the rights of transgender people. The issue in the case, the United States versus Skrmetti, is whether the condition of equal protection, which requires the government to treat people who are fine, prohibits countries that states allow medical services providers to provide puberty and hormones to help the minor move to another sex.

Higseth proposes the judge’s report to the military bases after the ruling that the Pentagon should allow the transgender forces.

However, a decision of the Supreme Court is not expected until May or June.

“Skrmetti’s decision will occupy a large part of the field here and provides some directions. Therefore, I doubt that the ongoing current circle will feel the need to rush to things,” said Charles Limson, a legal colleague at the Heritage Foundation, told Fox News Digital.

“If you are sitting on the capital’s circle and I have all these other cases that come on my way, and I was on a three -judge, I don’t think it will be the top of my pile.”

The American boycott judge, based in the capital, Anna Reyes, one of the appointed Biden, held a hearing on March 21 and asked the Ministry of Defense to delay the deadline on March 26. (Getty/Senatordurbin via YouTube)

Despite the deadline on the horizon, Stimson said the ban will be “on a temporary stop” as the parties work through the appeal process.

“I don’t think the Secretary will do anything that violates the court,” Stemphson said. “Even if they do not agree to that, it will be wise not to.”

Trump’s supervisor requests a federal judge to solve a judicial matter that prohibits a sexual argument

Reyes issued a preliminary judicial order in favor of the prosecutors on March 18. In her opinion, Reyce wrote that the plaintiffs of the lawsuit, who include transgender individuals, “face a violation of their constitutional rights, which are an irreplaceable damage” that would guarantee a preliminary rod. “

On March 21, the defendants in the lawsuit, including President Donald Trump and Defense Minister Beit Higseth, submitted a proposal to resolve the irritable order that prevents the Pentagon ban. The deposit argued that policy is not a comprehensive ban, but instead “it runs the gender transport defect-a medical condition-and does not distinguish against people who suffer from definition as a class.”

On March 21, the defendants in the lawsuit, including President Donald Trump and Defense Minister Beit Higseth, submitted a proposal to resolve the irritable order that prevents the Pentagon ban. (Reuters/Yves Hermann)

The Trump administration also requested that if the request for a solution is rejected, the court must remain in a preliminary judicial order pending the appeal.

The government indicated new directives that issued March 21 that it expected to enrich the policy that is not for continuous litigation. The guidelines showed that “the phrase” shows symptoms consistent with the dyslexia “” applies only to “individuals who show symptoms and will be sufficient to form the diagnosis.”

In its proposal, which is required to cancel the March 18 order, the government wrote that the March 21 instructions constitute a “major change” that would call the court that resolves the upholstery.

Click for the Fox News app

Under the requirements, the party that requests to dissolve a preliminary judicial matter must prove “a major change, whether in realistic circumstances or in the law” that indicates that the implementation of the continuous matter will be “harmful to the public interest.”

March 21, 2025, guidance is a “major change”, “provides for deposit files. “While the court has widely interpreted the scope of the Ministry of Defense’s policy to include all factors or applicants for identification, the new directive emphasizes the position of the consistent defendant that the Ministry of Defense policy is concerned with military preparation, the ability to exercise, and the costs related to a medical condition-one of the previous administration, to some extent, are kept from the army.”

Jake Gibson Fox News contributed to this report.