WATCH: GOP senators demand transparency while Dems call intel release distraction

After reports that senior officials of the Obama administration, it was claimed that an attempt to coordinate to sabotage the victory of Donald Trump’s 2016 president, calls on the Republican Party to transparency and accountability, while their democratic colleagues question the timing and credibility of new claims.

Trump’s National Intelligence Director, Toulcy Gabbard, issued a set of intelligence documents starting from last week that Gabbard said that former President Barack Obama promoted some of his “fabricated novel” advisers that Russia enters into the 2016 election to sabotage Trump.

However, Democrats insisted that congress investigations have already prove that Russia helped Trump in the 2016 elections, while questioning the timing of allegations due to pressure on Trump to launch more Epstein’s files.

“It is very uncomfortable, which is dangerous,” Republican Senator Ted Cruz told Fox News Digital, referring to Gabbard’s allegations. “What the administration urged to do is to engage in a radical transparency, make it all public and expose the Obama administration’s knowledge of what they were doing – that they knew that they are lying. I think anyone who violates the law should bear responsibility.”

DNI Gabbard claims that “deep state representatives” does not want Trump’s information Russia from “seeing the light”

But California’s Democratic Senator Adam Chef for Fox News Digital believes that allegations are hiding, pointing to the report of former FBI director Robert Muller 2019, who said, “Russia has documented to help Hillary Clinton, which gave a batch of Trump’s campaign.

“I think what Gabbard and its employees are doing is not safe,” he added.

However, Republican Senator Oklahoma James Lancford argued that it was “established long ago” that the steel file was “clearly the Clinton Factory” and that Clinton’s campaign was actually “cooperating with the Russians to be able to actually use the Russians to be able to interfere in President Trump’s campaign.”

Lancford said: “What Toulcy Gabbard is withdrawing is to say:“ How deep is this to the White House that they knew about the steel file, and they knew that it was the Clinton document. When did they start pushing this matter, and what are the official resources they used to try to add a healthy to this to be able to reduce the elections? ”

“We have cut a long way to go, but it is good to be able to get all the information, to be able to pull it there and say,” Let’s let everyone look at it and let the potatoes fall where they can. “

Obama’s mother officials about the “manufactured” allegations that Trump launches Russia are probe

The Director of National Intelligence, Toulcy Gabbard, addresses the press in the White House after he was put in place in the confidentiality in documents it says Trump’s narration Russia is “fabricated”. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images | Fox News Digital)

Senator Rick Scott, R and Florida, said he believed that Gabbard was doing the right thing, and expresses his hope for extreme transparency amid the allegations of concern.

“Part of what these elections were, it was about transparency and government accountability. This is exactly what [Gabbard] “He is trying to do, and this is exactly what the Trump administration is trying to do. Let’s put people in the facts. Let’s follow the place of facts. If someone does anything, we will bear it. So, I think the right process is what is happening.”

Senator Elissa Sluttin, De Mish, a former analyst for the CIA, asked at the time of Gabbard’s release of information, saying that her 10 -year -old nephew understood this step as “Dodge and Diarmism” to remove Epsin’s continuous controversy. Amid the issuance of the Gabbard document at the beginning of last week, Trump faces calls from within the Republican Party to issue more documents and information related to the disgraceful financier Jeffrey Epstein.

Senator Elissa Sluttin, de Mish, a former CIA analyst, asked at the time of Gabbard’s disclosure, describing them as “distraction” amid calls for transparency with Jeffrey Epstein’s files. (Associated Press)

“President Trump has had four years in his first term, and throughout the time since then, to pursue this issue, and chooses the same day as his name appears in Epstein’s files to talk about Barack Obama,” Slotkin told Fox News Digital. “The American people are not stupid. Like, we got it. Trump wanted to talk about something different. I must see these reports, and I see how they were obtained … I love reading and making my own evaluation. But the timing cannot be missed. The president tries to avoid and distract your attention.”

Click here to get the Fox News app

While partisan affiliation may play a role in how legislators and the broader audience offered Obama’s allegations issued by Gabbard, Senator John Bouzman, R-RK, he believes the issue goes beyond “party affiliation.

“Republican, democratic, I mean, as you know, this is something that goes beyond all. This is really important,” Bouzman told Fox News Digital. “We hope we have open transparency until people understand what is going on. Whatever it is, I am sure that Congress will participate, and certainly the Ministry of Justice is involved. Therefore, I think these are all good things.”