AI

Physicist Says He’s Identified a Clue That We’re Living in a Computer Simulation

What if gravity was informed of the way the issue was arranged in the universe – and a sign that we were living in a fact composed of a giant computer?

In a new paper published in the magazine AIP offersThe physicist of the University of Portsmouth Melvin Fobson presented a new explanation for attractiveness, on the pretext that it may be the result of the universe that tries to make itself less disturbing, and thus behaves like a computer algorithm.

“This is another example of data pressure and arithmetic improvement in our world, which supports the possibility of simulating the universe or arithmetic,” he wrote.

Vopson’s article is part of a larger movement for scientists who try to explain the forces of nature by saying that they are the result of a comprehensive simulation. In the early first decade of the twentieth century, the philosopher Nick poster suggested that our reality is to simulate the computer with which a very advanced civilization dreams, echoing the 1999 “The Matrix” plot.

But proving that the theory is a thorny issue, especially given whether we are already trapped in simulation, its creatures are likely to take measures to ensure our inability to a peek at the curtain.

VOPSON was built on the proposal of “the second law of information dynamics”, which believes that “entrance any system remains fixed or increases over time”, to argue that gravity combines material and things in space to maintain entropy, such as computer arrangement and pressure data.

“The results it reached in this study is appropriate to the belief that the universe may work like a giant computer, or that our reality is to build a simulation,” Fobson said in a statement. “Just like computers, you try to save space and run more efficiently, the universe may do the same.”

He added: “It is a new way to think about gravity, not only as clouds, but as something happens when the universe tries to remain organized.”

In his article, VOPSON argued that the information stored in primary cells, which is known as the smallest possible size in space in quantum mechanics, teaches the coordinates of the material inside the simulation, a type of pixel for individuals and zeros.

“The process is similar to how to design a digital computer game, virtual reality application, or other advanced simulation,” he said in the statement.

Each cell can suit more than one particle, which is very similar to the account system to the minimum information content.

“It is simply, more effective in terms of mathematical and followed the location and size of a single object in space, than many creatures,” said Fobson. “Therefore, the attractiveness of gravity seems to be just an improvement mechanism in an account that has a role to compress information.”

Vopson has always been in favor of simulation theory, under the pretext in 2022 that the Covid-19 Virus showed a decrease over time, supporting evidence of its second law on information dynamics.

In another paper to connect the eyebrows, assume that information can be “a fifth form of the issue”, claiming again that we live in a simulation.

But whether his research will get the prevailing acceptance and approval outside the margin of the scientific community, it must be seen.

After all, unusual allegations require unusual evidence – especially when you try to convert reality on his head.

More about simulation theory: Mathematics World: This is the reason that the theory of simulation is stupid

Don’t miss more hot News like this! AI/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click here to discover the latest in AI news!

2025-05-03 15:15:00

Related Articles

Back to top button